Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587972›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2013

Clinical Impact Upon Wound Healing and Inflammation in Moist, Wet, and Dry Environments.

Johan P E Junker, Rami A Kamel, E J Caterson, Elof Eriksson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03907111 (Develop the Biologic-fibrotic Dressing on War Open Bleeding Wounds for Hemostasis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 157 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03907111 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Develop the Biologic-fibrotic Dressing on War Open Bleeding Wounds for Hemostasis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorTri-Service General Hospital (TSGH)Ran2015 to 2016Enrolled10ConditionsHemostasisArmsChitosan Gauze, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of Rhino-Protect ointment after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Fractional COClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johan P E JunkerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rami A KamelDivision of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
E J CatersonDivision of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elof ErikssonDivision of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceSuccessful treatment of wounds relies on precise control and continuous monitoring of the wound-healing process. Wet or moist treatment of wounds has been shown to promote re-epithelialization and result in reduced scar formation, as compared to treatment in a dry environment. RECENT ADVANCES: By treating wounds in a controlled wet environment, delivery of antimicrobials, analgesics, other bioactive molecules such as growth factors, as well as cells and micrografts, is allowed. The addition of growth factors or transplantation of cells yields the possibility of creating a regenerative wound microenvironment that favors healing, as opposed to excessive scar formation. CRITICAL ISSUES: Although several manufacturers have conceived products implementing the concept of moist wound healing, there remains a lack of commercial translation of wet wound-healing principles into clinically available products. This can only be mitigated by further research on the topic. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: The strong evidence pointing to the favorable healing of wounds in a wet or moist environment compared to dry treatment will extend the clinical indications for this treatment. Further advances are required to elucidate by which means this microenvironment can be optimized to improve the healing outcome.

Identifiers

PMID24587972
PMCPMC3842869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.