Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587962›Full record

ArticleAJOB neuroscience2014

Brave New Love: The Threat of High-Tech "Conversion" Therapy and the Bio-Oppression of Sexual Minorities.

Brian D Earp, Anders Sandberg, Julian Savulescu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOB neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhancing Gender.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Addicted to love: What is love addiction and when should it be treated?Philosophy, psychiatry, & psychology : PPP · 2017
    Article
  4. The medicalization of love.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian D EarpUniversity of Oxford.
Anders SandbergUniversity of Oxford.
Julian SavulescuUniversity of Oxford.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 086041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the neurochemical bases of human love and attachment, as well as of the genetic, epigenetic, hormonal, and experiential factors that conspire to shape an individual's sexual orientation, is increasing exponentially. This research raises the vexing possibility that we may one day be equipped to modify such variables directly, allowing for the creation of "high-tech" conversion therapies or other suspect interventions. In this article, we discuss the ethics surrounding such a possibility, and call for the development of legal and procedural safeguards for protecting vulnerable children from the application of such technology. We also consider the more difficult case of voluntary, adult "conversion" and argue that in rare cases, such attempts might be permissible under strict conditions.

Indexed as

biotechnologyConversion therapygay conversionlove drugsneuroenhancementvalues

Identifiers

PMID24587962
PMCPMC3932804
OpenAlexW2010608504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.