Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587841›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2013

REFINING GENETICALLY INFERRED RELATIONSHIPS USING TREELET COVARIANCE SMOOTHING.

Andrew Crossett, Ann B Lee, Lambertus Klei, Bernie Devlin, Kathryn Roeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Limitations of GCTA as a solution to the missing heritability problem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Measuring missing heritability: inferring the contribution of common variants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  5. Effective genetic-risk prediction using mixed models.American journal of human genetics · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew CrossettWest Chester University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon University.
Ann B LeeWest Chester University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon University.
Lambertus KleiWest Chester University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon University.
Bernie DevlinWest Chester University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon University.
Kathryn RoederWest Chester University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon University.

Funding

Genetics Association in Schizophrenia and Other DisordersR37MH057881 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DEVLIN, BERNIE · 2013 to 2022
$5.4M
Population-Based Autism Genetics & Environment StudyR01MH097849 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BUXBAUM, JOSEPH D. · 2014 to 2022
$5.2M
GENETIC ASSOCIATION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA AND OTHER DISORDERSR01MH057881 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DEVLIN, BERNIE · 1998 to 2012
$4.8M
Population-Based Autism Genetics & Environment StudyR56MH097849 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BUXBAUM, JOSEPH D. · 2012 to 2013
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057881NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097849NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH057881NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH097849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances coupled with large sample sets have uncovered many factors underlying the genetic basis of traits and the predisposition to complex disease, but much is left to discover. A common thread to most genetic investigations is familial relationships. Close relatives can be identified from family records, and more distant relatives can be inferred from large panels of genetic markers. Unfortunately these empirical estimates can be noisy, especially regarding distant relatives. We propose a new method for denoising genetically-inferred relationship matrices by exploiting the underlying structure due to hierarchical groupings of correlated individuals. The approach, which we call Treelet Covariance Smoothing, employs a multiscale decomposition of covariance matrices to improve estimates of pairwise relationships. On both simulated and real data, we show that smoothing leads to better estimates of the relatedness amongst distantly related individuals. We illustrate our method with a large genome-wide association study and estimate the "heritability" of body mass index quite accurately. Traditionally heritability, defined as the fraction of the total trait variance attributable to additive genetic effects, is estimated from samples of closely related individuals using random effects models. We show that by using smoothed relationship matrices we can estimate heritability using population-based samples. Finally, while our methods have been developed for refining genetic relationship matrices and improving estimates of heritability, they have much broader potential application in statistics. Most notably, for error-in-variables random effects models and settings that require regularization of matrices with block or hierarchical structure.

Indexed as

Covariance estimationcryptic relatednessgenome-wide associationheritabilitykinship

Identifiers

PMID24587841
PMCPMC3935431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.