Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587467›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Comparison of three quality of life instruments in lymphatic filariasis: DLQI, WHODAS 2.0, and LFSQQ.

Cristina Thomas, Saravu R Narahari, Kuthaje S Bose, Kuthaje Vivekananda, Steven Nwe, Dennis P West, Mary Kwasny, Roopal V Kundu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristina ThomasDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Saravu R NarahariDepartment of Integrative Dermatology, Institute of Applied Dermatology, Uliyathadka, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Kuthaje S BoseDepartment of Integrative Dermatology, Institute of Applied Dermatology, Uliyathadka, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Kuthaje VivekanandaDepartment of Integrative Dermatology, Institute of Applied Dermatology, Uliyathadka, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Steven NweDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Dennis P WestDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Mary KwasnyDepartment of Preventative Medicine Biostatistics Collaboration Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Roopal V KunduDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Northwestern University · USInstitute of Applied Dermatology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Global Program to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis aims to interrupt transmission of lymphatic filariasis and manage morbidity in people currently living with the disease. A component of morbidity management is improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients. Measurement of HRQoL in current management programs is varied because of the lack of a standard HRQoL tool for use in the lymphatic filariasis population. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study, the psychometric properties of three health status measures were compared when used in a group of lymphatic filariasis patients and healthy controls. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and the Lymphatic Filariasis Quality of Life Questionnaire (LFSQQ) were administered to 36 stage II and stage III lymphatic filariasis subjects and 36 age and sex matched controls in Kerala, India. All three tools yielded missing value rates lower than 10%, suggesting high feasibility. Highest internal consistency was seen in the LFSQQ (α = 0.97). Discriminant validity analysis demonstrated that HRQoL was significantly lower in the LF group than in controls for the WHODAS 2.0, DLQI, and LFSQQ, but total HRQoL scores did not differ between stage II and stage III lymphedema subjects. The LFSQQ total score correlated most strongly with the WHODAS 2.0 (r = 0.91, p<0.001) and DLQI (r = 0.81, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The WHODAS 2.0, DLQI, and LFSQQ demonstrate acceptable feasibility, internal consistency, discriminate validity, and construct validity. Based on our psychometric analyses, the LFSQQ performs the best and is recommended for use in the lymphatic filariasis population.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Sectional StudiesElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24587467
PMCPMC3930502
OpenAlexW2027108152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.