Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587403›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Identification of suitable reference genes for gene expression normalization in qRT-PCR analysis in watermelon.

Qiusheng Kong, Jingxian Yuan, Lingyun Gao, Shuang Zhao, Wei Jiang, Yuan Huang, Zhilong Bie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. qPCR-Based Reference Gene Validation inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fine mapping and identification of the geneFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  13. EditingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterization ofFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiusheng KongKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education/College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Jingxian YuanKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education/College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Lingyun GaoKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education/College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Shuang ZhaoKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education/College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Wei JiangKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education/College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yuan HuangKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education/College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Zhilong BieKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education/College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Watermelon is one of the major Cucurbitaceae crops and the recent availability of genome sequence greatly facilitates the fundamental researches on it. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) is the preferred method for gene expression analyses, and using validated reference genes for normalization is crucial to ensure the accuracy of this method. However, a systematic validation of reference genes has not been conducted on watermelon. In this study, transcripts of 15 candidate reference genes were quantified in watermelon using qRT-PCR, and the stability of these genes was compared using geNorm and NormFinder. geNorm identified ClTUA and ClACT, ClEF1α and ClACT, and ClCAC and ClTUA as the best pairs of reference genes in watermelon organs and tissues under normal growth conditions, abiotic stress, and biotic stress, respectively. NormFinder identified ClYLS8, ClUBCP, and ClCAC as the best single reference genes under the above experimental conditions, respectively. ClYLS8 and ClPP2A were identified as the best reference genes across all samples. Two to nine reference genes were required for more reliable normalization depending on the experimental conditions. The widely used watermelon reference gene 18SrRNA was less stable than the other reference genes under the experimental conditions. Catalase family genes were identified in watermelon genome, and used to validate the reliability of the identified reference genes. ClCAT1and ClCAT2 were induced and upregulated in the first 24 h, whereas ClCAT3 was downregulated in the leaves under low temperature stress. However, the expression levels of these genes were significantly overestimated and misinterpreted when 18SrRNA was used as a reference gene. These results provide a good starting point for reference gene selection in qRT-PCR analyses involving watermelon.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantActinsCatalaseCitrullusCold TemperatureGene Expression ProfilingGenes, PlantIsoenzymesPeptide Elongation Factor 1Plant LeavesPlant ProteinsReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 18STubulinActinsCatalaseIsoenzymesPeptide Elongation Factor 1Plant ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 18STubulin

Identifiers

PMID24587403
PMCPMC3938773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.