Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587355›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Amphetamine fails to alter cued recollection of emotional images: study of encoding, retrieval, and state-dependency.

Jessica Weafer, David A Gallo, Harriet de Wit

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica WeaferDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
David A GalloDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Funding

Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
Acquisition and persistence of drug cue conditioning in humans - Resubmission 01R01DA037011 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Memory effects of stimulant drugs in humansR21DA031796 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2012 to 2013
$411k
Impulsivity and Stimulant Drug RewardF32DA033756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WEAFER, JESSICA J · 2012 to 2014
$130k
NIDA NIH HHS DA002812NIDA NIH HHS DA031796NIDA NIH HHS DA033756NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA033756NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037011NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA031796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulant drugs facilitate both encoding and retrieval of salient information in laboratory animals, but less is known about their effects on memory for emotionally salient visual images in humans. The current study investigated dextroamphetamine (AMP) effects on memory for emotional pictures in healthy humans, by administering the drug only at encoding, only at retrieval, or at both encoding and retrieval. During the encoding session, all participants viewed standardized positive, neutral, and negative pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). 48 hours later they attended a retrieval session testing their cued recollection of these stimuli. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions (N=20 each): condition AP (20 mg AMP at encoding and placebo (PL) at retrieval); condition PA (PL at encoding and AMP at retrieval); condition AA (AMP at encoding and retrieval); or condition PP (PL at encoding and retrieval). Amphetamine produced its expected effects on physiological and subjective measures, and negative pictures were recollected more frequently than neutral pictures. However, contrary to hypotheses, AMP did not affect recollection for positive, negative, or neutral stimuli, whether it was administered at encoding, retrieval, or at both encoding and retrieval. Moreover, recollection accuracy was not state-dependent. Considered in light of other recent drug studies in humans, this study highlights the sensitivity of drug effects to memory testing conditions and suggests future strategies for translating preclinical findings to human behavioral laboratories.

Indexed as

CuesAdolescentAdultAmphetamineArea Under CurveCentral Nervous System StimulantsEmotionsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMental RecallRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung AdultAmphetamineCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID24587355
PMCPMC3937372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.