Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587141›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Hospital presenting self-harm and risk of fatal and non-fatal repetition: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robert Carroll, Chris Metcalfe, David Gunnell

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 229 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
229citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03473535 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The BEACON Study: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Smartphone-assisted Problem Solving Therapy in Men Who Present With Intentional Self-harm to Emergency Departments in Ontario

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsIntentional Self-Harm, SuicideArmsBEACON + Problem Solving Therapy, Problem-Solving Therapy
NCT03489382 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The BEACON Study: Protocol for Cluster RCT of a Service to Deliver Smartphone-Assisted Problem-Solving Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Men Who Present With Intentional Self-Harm to the ED in Ontario (Protocol A)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsIntentional Self-Harm, SuicideArmsSmartphone Assisted PST
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

229 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pharmacological interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Global Perspectives on Adolescent Suicide and Self-Harm: Findings and Insights From the ASCAPAP Grand Forum.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

169 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert CarrollSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Chris MetcalfeSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
David GunnellSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2012-05-189Department of Health NF-SI-0512-10068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-fatal self-harm is one of the most frequent reasons for emergency hospital admission and the strongest risk factor for subsequent suicide. Repeat self-harm and suicide are key clinical outcomes of the hospital management of self-harm. We have undertaken a comprehensive review of the international literature on the incidence of fatal and non-fatal repeat self-harm and investigated factors influencing variation in these estimates as well as changes in the incidence of repeat self-harm and suicide over the last 30 years. METHODS AND

findingsMedline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, article reference lists and personal paper collections of the authors were searched for studies describing rates of fatal and non-fatal self-harm amongst people who presented to health care services for deliberate self-harm. Heterogeneity in pooled estimates of repeat self-harm incidence was investigated using stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression. The search identified 177 relevant papers. The risk of suicide in the 12 months after an index attempt was 1.6% (CI 1.2-2.4) and 3.9% (CI 3.2-4.8) after 5 years. The estimated 1 year rate of non-fatal repeat self-harm was 16.3% (CI 15.1-17.7). This proportion was considerably lower in Asian countries (10.0%, CI 7.3-13.6%) and varies between studies identifying repeat episodes using hospital admission data (13.7%, CI 12.3-15.3) and studies using patient report (21.9%, CI 14.3-32.2). There was no evidence that the incidence of repeat self-harm was lower in more recent (post 2000) studies compared to those from the 1980s and 1990s.

conclusionsOne in 25 patients presenting to hospital for self-harm will kill themselves in the next 5 years. The incidence of repeat self-harm and suicide in this population has not changed in over 10 years. Different methods of identifying repeat episodes of self-harm produce varying estimates of incidence and this heterogeneity should be considered when evaluating interventions aimed at reducing non-fatal repeat self-harm.

Indexed as

FemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicide

Identifiers

PMID24587141
PMCPMC3938547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.