SynthesisPloS one2014
Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 74 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 403 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging technologies and neuroscience-based approaches in dyslexia: a narrative review toward integrative and personalized solutions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Reading intervention and neuroplasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of brain changes associated with reading intervention.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Dyslexia treatment studies: A systematic review and suggestions on testing treatment efficacy with small effects and small samples.Behavior research methods · 2021Pooled it
- Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- The Diagnosis and Treatment of Reading and/or Spelling Disorders in Children and Adolescents.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Pooled it
- Prismatic adaptation coupled with cognitive training as novel treatment for developmental dyslexia: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Improving Reading Skills Using a Computerized Phonological Training Program in Early Readers with Reading Difficulties.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Trajectories of Response to Treatments in Children with ADHD and Word Reading Difficulties.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Dispelling Myths and Misunderstandings About Defining and Remediating Dyslexia.Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
- Short Report: Intervention of Reading and Spelling Problems in Children With Co-Occurring Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Dyslexia.Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2026Article
- A Preliminary Evaluation of Dyslexie's Influence on Adult Dyslexic Reading Performance.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Resting-State Electroencephalogram (EEG) as a Biomarker of Learning Disabilities in Children-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cognitive Training Combined with Multifocal tDCS over the Reading Network Improves Reading Performance: A Case of Severe Dyslexia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Flickering lenses enhance reading performance through placebo effect.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Article
- Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.Annals of dyslexia · 2025Article
- Bridging the Gap in Adult Dyslexia Research: Assessing the Efficacy of a Linguistic Intervention on Literacy Skills.Annals of dyslexia · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Developmental Dyslexia: a scoping review.CoDAS · 2025Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children and adolescents with reading disabilities experience a significant impairment in the acquisition of reading and spelling skills. Given the emotional and academic consequences for children with persistent reading disorders, evidence-based interventions are critically needed. The present meta-analysis extracts the results of all available randomized controlled trials. The aims were to determine the effectiveness of different treatment approaches and the impact of various factors on the efficacy of interventions. The literature search for published randomized-controlled trials comprised an electronic search in the databases ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Cochrane, and an examination of bibliographical references. To check for unpublished trials, we searched the websites clinicaltrials.com and ProQuest, and contacted experts in the field. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials with a total of 49 comparisons of experimental and control groups could be included. The comparisons evaluated five reading fluency trainings, three phonemic awareness instructions, three reading comprehension trainings, 29 phonics instructions, three auditory trainings, two medical treatments, and four interventions with coloured overlays or lenses. One trial evaluated the effectiveness of sunflower therapy and another investigated the effectiveness of motor exercises. The results revealed that phonics instruction is not only the most frequently investigated treatment approach, but also the only approach whose efficacy on reading and spelling performance in children and adolescents with reading disabilities is statistically confirmed. The mean effect sizes of the remaining treatment approaches did not reach statistical significance. The present meta-analysis demonstrates that severe reading and spelling difficulties can be ameliorated with appropriate treatment. In order to be better able to provide evidence-based interventions to children and adolescent with reading disabilities, research should intensify the application of blinded randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.