Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587074›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

PrediQt-Cx: post treatment health related quality of life prediction model for cervical cancer patients.

Satwant Kumar, Madhu Lata Rana, Khushboo Verma, Narayanjeet Singh, Anil Kumar Sharma, Arun Kumar Maria, Gobind Singh Dhaliwal, Harkiran Kaur Khaira, Sunil Saini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Predicting health-related quality of life for patients with gastroesophageal cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality of life and Its Determinants among Cervical Cancer Patients in South India.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Satwant KumarInstitute of Bioinformatics, Bangalore, Karnataka, India ; Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Madhu Lata RanaAdesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India ; Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences(HIMS), Dehradun, Uttarkhand, India.
Khushboo VermaRabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Narayanjeet SinghAdesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India ; Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences(HIMS), Dehradun, Uttarkhand, India.
Anil Kumar SharmaAdesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Arun Kumar MariaAdesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Gobind Singh DhaliwalAdesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Harkiran Kaur KhairaAdesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Sunil SainiHimalayan Institute of Medical Sciences(HIMS), Dehradun, Uttarkhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is the third largest cause of cancer mortality in India. The objectives of the study were to compare the pre and the post treatment quality of life in cervical cancer patients and to develop a prediction model to provide an insight into the possibilities in the treatment modules. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA total of 198 patients were assessed with two structured questionnaires of Health Related Quality of Life (The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC QLQ C-30 and CX-24). The baseline observations were recorded when the patients first reported (T1) and second evaluation was done at 6 months post treatment (T2). The mean age of detection was 50.9 years with the literacy level being non-educated or less than high school. Majority of them were married/cohabiting 179 (90.4%). On histopathological examination (HPE) squamous cell carcinoma was found to be the most common cell type carcinoma 147 (74.2%) followed by Adenocarcinoma 31 (15.7%). Radical hysterectomy was the most common treatment modality 76 (38.4%), followed by Wertheims Hysterectomy 46 (23.2%) and Radiochemotherapy 59 (29.8%). The mean score of global health of cervical cancer patients post treatment was 77.90, which was significantly higher than the pre - treatment score (54.32). Mean "symptoms score" post treatment was 21.69 with an aggravation of 7.32 compared to pre treatment scores. Patients experienced substantial decrease in sexual activity post treatment. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The prediction model(PrediQt-Cx), based on Support Vector Machine(SVM) for predicting post treatment HRQoL in cervical cancer patients was developed and internally cross validated. After external validation PrediQt-Cx can be easily employed to support decision making by clinicians and patients from north India region, through openly made available for access at http://prediqt.org.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalFemaleHumansIndiaLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24587074
PMCPMC3935936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.