Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24587038›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Detecting potential adverse reactions of sulpiride in schizophrenic patients by prescription sequence symmetry analysis.

Edward Chia-Cheng Lai, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, Yea-Huei Kao Yang, Swu-Jane Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edward Chia-Cheng LaiInstitute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yang HsiehInstitute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan ; Department of Neurology, Tainan Sin-Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yea-Huei Kao YangInstitute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan ; Health Outcome Research Center, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Swu-Jane LinDepartment of Pharmacy Administration, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
National Cheng Kung University · TWSin-Lau Christian Hospital · TWUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies have demonstrated sulpiride to be significantly more effective than haloperidol, risperidone and olanzapine in schizophrenic treatment; however, only limited information is available on the potential risks associated with sulpiride treatment. This study attempts to provide information on the potential risks of sulpiride treatment of schizophrenia, especially with regard to unexpected adverse effects. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with schizophrenia aged 18 and older, newly prescribed with a single antipsychotic medication from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan in the period from 2003 to 2010 were included. A within-subject comparison method, prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) was employed to efficiently identify potential causal relationships while controlling for potential selection bias.

resultsA total of 5,750 patients, with a mean age of 39, approximately half of whom were male, constituted the study cohort. The PSSA found that sulpiride was associated with EPS (adjusted SR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.46-2.06) and hyperprolactinemia (12.04; 1.59-91.2). In comparison, EPS caused by haloperidol has a magnitude of 1.99 when analyzed with PSSA, and hyperprolactinemia caused by amisulpride has a magnitude of 8.05, respectively. Another finding was the unexpected increase in the use of stomatological corticosteroids, emollient laxatives, dermatological preparations of corticosteroids, quinolone antibacterials, and topical products for joint and muscular pain, after initiation of sulpiride treatment.

conclusionsWe found sulpiride to be associated with an increased risk of EPS and hyperprolactinemia, and the potential risk could be as high as that induced by haloperidol and amisulpride, respectively. Additionally, our study provides grounds for future investigations into the associations between sulpiride and the increased use of additional drugs for managing adverse effects, including stomatological, dermatological, and musculoskeletal or joint side effects, constipation, and pneumonia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmisulprideAntipsychotic AgentsChildCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSulpirideAmisulprideAntipsychotic AgentsSulpiride

Identifiers

PMID24587038
PMCPMC3937342
OpenAlexW1996770062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.