Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586892›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Noroviral p-particles as an in vitro model to assess the interactions of noroviruses with probiotics.

Antonio Rubio-del-Campo, José M Coll-Marqués, María J Yebra, Javier Buesa, Gaspar Pérez-Martínez, Vicente Monedero, Jesús Rodríguez-Díaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Gut microbes · 2025
    Article
  3. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Rubio-del-CampoLaboratory of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Probiotics, Biotechnology Department, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
José M Coll-MarquésLaboratory of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Probiotics, Biotechnology Department, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
María J YebraLaboratory of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Probiotics, Biotechnology Department, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Javier BuesaDepartment of Microbiology and Ecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Gaspar Pérez-MartínezLaboratory of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Probiotics, Biotechnology Department, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Vicente MonederoLaboratory of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Probiotics, Biotechnology Department, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Jesús Rodríguez-DíazLaboratory of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Probiotics, Biotechnology Department, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noroviruses (NoVs) are the main etiologic agents of acute epidemic gastroenteritis and probiotic bacteria have been reported to exert a positive effect on viral diarrhea. The protruding (P) domain from NoVs VP1 capsid protein has the ability to assemble into the so-called P-particles, which retain the binding ability to host receptors. We purified the P-domains from NoVs genotypes GI.1 and GII.4 as 6X(His)-tagged proteins and determined that, similar to native domains, they were structured into P-particles that were functional in the recognition of the specific glycoconjugated receptors, as established by surface plasmon resonance experiments. We showed that several lactic acid bacteria (probiotic and non-probiotic) and a Gram-negative probiotic strain have the ability to bind P-particles on their surfaces irrespective of their probiotic status. The binding of P-particles (GI.1) to HT-29 cells in the presence of selected strains showed that bacteria can inhibit P-particle attachment in competitive exclusion experiments. However, pre-treatment of cells with bacteria or adding bacteria to cells with already attached P-particles enhanced the retention of the particles. Although direct viral binding and blocking of viral receptors have been postulated as mechanisms of protection against viral infection by probiotic bacteria, these results highlight the need for a careful evaluation of this hypothesis. The work presented here investigates for the first time the probiotic-NoVs-host interactions and points up the NoVs P-particles as useful tools to overcome the absence of in vitro cellular models to propagate these viruses.

Indexed as

Virus AttachmentCapsid ProteinsEnterocytesEscherichia coliHost-Pathogen InteractionsHT29 CellsHumansLacticaseibacillus caseiNorovirusProbioticsProtein BindingReceptors, VirusSurface Plasmon ResonanceCapsid ProteinsReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID24586892
PMCPMC3931819
OpenAlexW2031609764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.