Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Diagnosis of canine leptospirosis by a highly sensitive FRET-PCR targeting the lig genes.

Chuanling Xu, Amanda Loftis, Sudhir K Ahluwalia, Dongya Gao, Ashutosh Verma, Chengming Wang, Bernhard Kaltenboeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Pathways ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular and Serological Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Veterinary medicine international · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chuanling XuDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Amanda LoftisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, St. Kitts, West Indies.
Sudhir K AhluwaliaDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Dongya GaoDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Ashutosh VermaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, St. Kitts, West Indies.
Chengming WangDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Bernhard KaltenboeckDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Auburn University · USRoss University School of Veterinary Medicine · KN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine leptospirosis is underdiagnosed due to its wide spectrum of clinical presentations and the lack of a rapid and sensitive test for the accurate diagnosis of acute and chronic infections. In this study, we developed a highly sensitive and specific fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-PCR to detect common pathogenic leptospires in dogs, including Leptospira interrogans serovars Autumnalis, Canicola, Copenhageni (Icterohaemorrhagiae serogroup) and Pomona, and Leptospira kirschneri serovar Grippotyphosa. This PCR targets the lig genes, exclusively found in the pathogenic Leptospira species but not in saprophytic species (L. biflexa). A robust, high-stringency step-down real-time platform was coupled to the highly specific detection of leptospiral DNA by fluorescently labeled FRET probes. This enabled the detection of a single copy of the lig gene in a PCR containing DNA from up to 50 µL canine blood or 400 µL urine. Sensitivity determination by use of limiting serial dilutions of extracted leptospiral DNA indicated that the lig FRET-PCR we established was almost 100-fold more sensitive than the widely accepted lipL32 SYBR assay and 10-fold more sensitive than a 16S rRNA TaqMan assay. Application of this method to 207 dogs with potential leptospiral infection enabled us to diagnose three cases of canine leptospirosis characterized by low amounts of leptospiral DNA in body fluids. Detection of canine leptospirosis with the lig FRET-PCR was more sensitive with the lig FRET-PCR than with the 16S rRNA TaqMan PCR, which detected only 2 of the 3 cases, and the lipL32 SYBR PCR, which detected none of the 3 dogs with leptospirosis.

Indexed as

Agglutination TestsAnimalsBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDog DiseasesDogsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGenes, BacterialLeptospiraLeptospirosisMolecular Sequence DataReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24586833
PMCPMC3933566
OpenAlexW1974671404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.