Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586824›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Transcriptome analysis reveals common and distinct mechanisms for sheepgrass (Leymus chinensis) responses to defoliation compared to mechanical wounding.

Shuangyan Chen, Yueyue Cai, Lexin Zhang, Xueqing Yan, Liqin Cheng, Dongmei Qi, Qingyuan Zhou, Xiaoxia Li, Gongshe Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcriptional Memory inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuangyan ChenKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yueyue CaiKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China ; Graduate Schoo1 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Lexin ZhangKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China ; Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Heze, Shandong, P.R. China.
Xueqing YanKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China ; Graduate Schoo1 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Liqin ChengKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Dongmei QiKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Qingyuan ZhouKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xiaoxia LiKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Gongshe LiuKey Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHerbivore grazing is a multiple-component process that includes wounding, defoliation, and saliva deposition. Despite the extensive published research on mechanical wounding and defoliation, no analysis to identify the genes that specify defoliation and mechanical wounding has been performed. Moreover, the influence of the expression of these genes on plant regrowth after defoliation remains poorly understood.

resultsSeven cDNA libraries for RNA samples collected from stubble tissues that had been mechanically wounded or defoliated at 2, 6 and 24 h along with the control were sequenced using the Illumina/Solexa platform. A comparative transcriptomic analysis of the sequencing data was conducted. In total, 1,836 and 3,238 genes were detected with significant differential expression levels after wounding and defoliation, respectively, during one day. GO, KOG and pathway-based enrichment analyses were performed to determine and further understand the biological functions of those differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The results demonstrated that both wounding and defoliation activated the systemic synthesis of jasmonate (JA). However, defoliation specifically reduced the expression levels of ribosomal protein genes, cell division or cell expansion-related genes, and lignin biosynthesis genes and may have negatively affected plant growth. Further analysis revealed that the regrowth of elongating leaves was significantly retarded after defoliation at 6 h through the following 7 days of measurement, suggesting that the gene expression pattern and phenotype are consistent. Fifteen genes were selected, and their expression levels were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). Thirteen of them exhibited expression patterns consistent with the digital gene expression (DGE) data.

conclusionsThese sequencing datasets allowed us to elucidate the common and distinct mechanisms of plant responses to defoliation and wounding. Additionally, the distinct DEGs represent a valuable resource for novel gene discovery that may improve plant resistance to defoliation from various processes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene OntologyGenes, PlantHerbivoryPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPoaceaeTranscriptomePlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24586824
PMCPMC3931765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.