ArticlePloS one2014
Estimating dose painting effects in radiotherapy: a mathematical model.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Tumor Treatment Through Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Modeling: A Comprehensive Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Histogram Analysis and Heterogeneous Radial Changes Using ADC Map Images in Metastatic Brain Tumors for Dose Painting Intent.Advanced biomedical research · 2026Article
- Modeling of chemo-radiotherapy targeting growing vascular tumors: A continuum-level approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Predicting Radiotherapy Patient Outcomes with Real-Time Clinical Data Using Mathematical Modelling.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Simulating tumor volume dynamics in response to radiotherapy: Implications of model selection.Journal of theoretical biology · 2024Article
- Rethinking the potential role of dose painting in personalized ultra-fractionated stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Small Animal IMRT Using 3D-Printed Compensators.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Article
- Reciprocal interactions between tumour cell populations enhance growth and reduce radiation sensitivity in prostate cancer.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Towards Multidrug Adaptive Therapy.Cancer research · 2020Article
- Article
- Hybrid modeling frameworks of tumor development and treatment.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
- Modeling the effect of intratumoral heterogeneity of radiosensitivity on tumor response over the course of fractionated radiation therapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2019Article
- Immunologic Consequences of Sequencing Cancer Radiotherapy and Surgery.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019Article
- A Review of Cell-Based Computational Modeling in Cancer Biology.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019Review
- Towards patient-specific modeling of brain tumor growth and formation of secondary nodes guided by DTI-MRI.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Article
- The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Review
- Homeostasis Back and Forth: An Ecoevolutionary Perspective of Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017Review
- Why one-size-fits-all vaso-modulatory interventions fail to control glioma invasion: in silico insights.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Artificial Life in Quantum Technologies.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Cancer Stem Cell Plasticity as Tumor Growth Promoter and Catalyst of Population Collapse.Stem cells international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor heterogeneity is widely considered to be a determinant factor in tumor progression and in particular in its recurrence after therapy. Unfortunately, current medical techniques are unable to deduce clinically relevant information about tumor heterogeneity by means of non-invasive methods. As a consequence, when radiotherapy is used as a treatment of choice, radiation dosimetries are prescribed under the assumption that the malignancy targeted is of a homogeneous nature. In this work we discuss the effects of different radiation dose distributions on heterogeneous tumors by means of an individual cell-based model. To that end, a case is considered where two tumor cell phenotypes are present, which we assume to strongly differ in their respective cell cycle duration and radiosensitivity properties. We show herein that, as a result of such differences, the spatial distribution of the corresponding phenotypes, whence the resulting tumor heterogeneity can be predicted as growth proceeds. In particular, we show that if we start from a situation where a majority of ordinary cancer cells (CCs) and a minority of cancer stem cells (CSCs) are randomly distributed, and we assume that the length of CSC cycle is significantly longer than that of CCs, then CSCs become concentrated at an inner region as tumor grows. As a consequence we obtain that if CSCs are assumed to be more resistant to radiation than CCs, heterogeneous dosimetries can be selected to enhance tumor control by boosting radiation in the region occupied by the more radioresistant tumor cell phenotype. It is also shown that, when compared with homogeneous dose distributions as those being currently delivered in clinical practice, such heterogeneous radiation dosimetries fare always better than their homogeneous counterparts. Finally, limitations to our assumptions and their resulting clinical implications will be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.