Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586734›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Estimating dose painting effects in radiotherapy: a mathematical model.

Juan Carlos López Alfonso, Nick Jagiella, Luis Núñez, Miguel A Herrero, Dirk Drasdo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Small Animal IMRT Using 3D-Printed Compensators.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hybrid modeling frameworks of tumor development and treatment.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Review
  17. Homeostasis Back and Forth: An Ecoevolutionary Perspective of Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Carlos López AlfonsoDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nick JagiellaInstitut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA), Domaine de Voluceau - Rocquencourt, Paris, France ; Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Luis NúñezRadiophysics Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel A HerreroDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Dirk DrasdoInstitut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA), Domaine de Voluceau - Rocquencourt, Paris, France ; University of Paris 6 (UPMC), CNRS UMR 7598, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Paris, France ; Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics (IZBI), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity is widely considered to be a determinant factor in tumor progression and in particular in its recurrence after therapy. Unfortunately, current medical techniques are unable to deduce clinically relevant information about tumor heterogeneity by means of non-invasive methods. As a consequence, when radiotherapy is used as a treatment of choice, radiation dosimetries are prescribed under the assumption that the malignancy targeted is of a homogeneous nature. In this work we discuss the effects of different radiation dose distributions on heterogeneous tumors by means of an individual cell-based model. To that end, a case is considered where two tumor cell phenotypes are present, which we assume to strongly differ in their respective cell cycle duration and radiosensitivity properties. We show herein that, as a result of such differences, the spatial distribution of the corresponding phenotypes, whence the resulting tumor heterogeneity can be predicted as growth proceeds. In particular, we show that if we start from a situation where a majority of ordinary cancer cells (CCs) and a minority of cancer stem cells (CSCs) are randomly distributed, and we assume that the length of CSC cycle is significantly longer than that of CCs, then CSCs become concentrated at an inner region as tumor grows. As a consequence we obtain that if CSCs are assumed to be more resistant to radiation than CCs, heterogeneous dosimetries can be selected to enhance tumor control by boosting radiation in the region occupied by the more radioresistant tumor cell phenotype. It is also shown that, when compared with homogeneous dose distributions as those being currently delivered in clinical practice, such heterogeneous radiation dosimetries fare always better than their homogeneous counterparts. Finally, limitations to our assumptions and their resulting clinical implications will be discussed.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalRadiotherapy DosageHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID24586734
PMCPMC3935877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.