ArticlePloS one2014
Genome-wide methylation analyses in glioblastoma multiforme.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric and visualization analysis in the field of epigenetics and glioma (2009-2024).Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- DNA methylation variations of DNA damage response in glioblastoma: NSUN5 modulates tumor-intrinsic cytosolic DNA-sensing and microglial behavior.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Glioblastoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Its Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Innovative Therapeutic Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identifies potent CpG signature for temzolomide response in non-G-CIMP glioblastomas with unmethylated MGMT promoter: MGMT-dependent roles of GPR81.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Review
- Mitoepigenetics and gliomas: epigenetic alterations to mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA alter mtDNA expression and contribute to glioma pathogenicity.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Article
- Integrative analysis identifies an immune-relevant epigenetic signature for prognostication of non-G-CIMP glioblastomas.Oncoimmunology · 2021Article
- DNA methylation analysis with methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM) reveals gene panel for glioma characteristics.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2020Article
- Genome‑wide DNA methylation regulation analysis of long non‑coding RNAs in glioblastoma.International journal of molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Computational identification and characterization of glioma candidate biomarkers through multi-omics integrative profiling.Biology direct · 2020Article
- BET inhibitor I-BET151 sensitizes GBM cells to temozolomide via PUMA induction.Cancer gene therapy · 2020Article
- Distinguishing Glioblastoma Subtypes by Methylation Signatures.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Identification of aberrantly methylated differentially expressed genes in glioblastoma multiforme and their association with patient survival.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- DNA methylation profiling identifies potentially significant epigenetically-regulated genes in glioblastoma multiforme.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Novel predictive epigenetic signature for temozolomide in non-G-CIMP glioblastomas.Clinical epigenetics · 2019Article
- Subtype-specific signaling pathways and genomic aberrations associated with prognosis of glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Whole-Genome Multi-omic Study of Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- A novel prognostic six-CpG signature in glioblastomas.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018Article
- Integrative analysis of novel hypomethylation and gene expression signatures in glioblastomas.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies had investigated genome-wide methylation in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Our goals were to study differential methylation across the genome in gene promoters using an array-based method, as well as repetitive elements using surrogate global methylation markers. The discovery sample set for this study consisted of 54 GBM from Columbia University and Case Western Reserve University, and 24 brain controls from the New York Brain Bank. We assembled a validation dataset using methylation data of 162 TCGA GBM and 140 brain controls from dbGAP. HumanMethylation27 Analysis Bead-Chips (Illumina) were used to interrogate 26,486 informative CpG sites in both the discovery and validation datasets. Global methylation levels were assessed by analysis of L1 retrotransposon (LINE1), 5 methyl-deoxycytidine (5m-dC) and 5 hydroxylmethyl-deoxycytidine (5hm-dC) in the discovery dataset. We validated a total of 1548 CpG sites (1307 genes) that were differentially methylated in GBM compared to controls. There were more than twice as many hypomethylated genes as hypermethylated ones. Both the discovery and validation datasets found 5 tumor methylation classes. Pathway analyses showed that the top ten pathways in hypomethylated genes were all related to functions of innate and acquired immunities. Among hypermethylated pathways, transcriptional regulatory network in embryonic stem cells was the most significant. In the study of global methylation markers, 5m-dC level was the best discriminant among methylation classes, whereas in survival analyses, high level of LINE1 methylation was an independent, favorable prognostic factor in the discovery dataset. Based on a pathway approach, hypermethylation in genes that control stem cell differentiation were significant, poor prognostic factors of overall survival in both the discovery and validation datasets. Approaches that targeted these methylated genes may be a future therapeutic goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.