Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586698›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A novel predictive equation for potential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Ratthaphol Kraiklang, Chawalit Pairojkul, Narong Khuntikeo, Kanokwan Imtawil, Sopit Wongkham, Chaisiri Wongkham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles identifies differential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum CA19-9 in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The role ofJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ratthaphol KraiklangDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand ; Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarcinoma Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chawalit PairojkulDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand ; Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarcinoma Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Narong KhuntikeoDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand ; Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarcinoma Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Kanokwan ImtawilDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand ; Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarcinoma Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Sopit WongkhamDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand ; Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarcinoma Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chaisiri WongkhamDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand ; Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarcinoma Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common-primary liver cancer. The difficulties in diagnosis limit successful treatment of CCA. At present, histological investigation is the standard diagnosis for CCA. However, there are some poor-defined tumor tissues which cannot be definitively diagnosed by general histopathology. As molecular signatures can define molecular phenotypes related to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment outcome, and CCA is the second most common cancer found after hepatocellularcarcinoma (HCC), the aim of this study was to develop a predictive model which differentiates CCA from HCC and normal liver tissues. An in-house PCR array containing 176 putative CCA marker genes was tested with the training set tissues of 20 CCA and 10 HCC cases. The molecular signature of CCA revealed the prominent expression of genes involved in cell adhesion and cell movement, whereas HCC showed elevated expression of genes related to cell proliferation/differentiation and metabolisms. A total of 69 genes differentially expressed in CCA and HCC were optimized statistically to formulate a diagnostic equation which distinguished CCA cases from HCC cases. Finally, a four-gene diagnostic equation (CLDN4, HOXB7, TMSB4 and TTR) was formulated and then successfully validated using real-time PCR in an independent testing set of 68 CCA samples and 77 non-CCA controls. Discrimination analysis showed that a combination of these genes could be used as a diagnostic marker for CCA with better diagnostic parameters with high sensitivity and specificity than using a single gene marker or the usual serum markers (CA19-9 and CEA). This new combination marker may help physicians to identify CCA in liver tissues when the histopathology is uncertain.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCholangiocarcinomaClaudin-4Homeodomain ProteinsHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, AlbuminClaudin-4CLDN4 protein, humanHomeodomain ProteinsHOXB7 protein, humanReceptors, Albumintransthyretin receptor

Identifiers

PMID24586698
PMCPMC3938437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.