Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586689›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Automated detection of off-label drug use.

Kenneth Jung, Paea LePendu, William S Chen, Srinivasan V Iyer, Ben Readhead, Joel T Dudley, Nigam H Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Medication-indication knowledge bases: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biological therapy for ocular Behçet's disease with off-label drug prescription in Turkey.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Review
  5. Hierarchical Concept Relations Improve Detection of Off-Label Drug Use in Electronic Health Records Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Developing a Data-driven Medication Indication Knowledge Base using a Large Scale Medical Claims Database.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A scientist engineer's contribution to therapeutic discovery and development.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Synergistic drug combinations from electronic health records and gene expression.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kenneth JungProgram In Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Paea LePenduCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
William S ChenCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Srinivasan V IyerProgram In Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Ben ReadheadIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
Joel T DudleyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
Nigam H ShahCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Methods for generalized ontology terms enrichment analysisR01LM011369 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2013 to 2020
$5.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028NHGRI NIH HHS U54-HG004028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Off-label drug use, defined as use of a drug in a manner that deviates from its approved use defined by the drug's FDA label, is problematic because such uses have not been evaluated for safety and efficacy. Studies estimate that 21% of prescriptions are off-label, and only 27% of those have evidence of safety and efficacy. We describe a data-mining approach for systematically identifying off-label usages using features derived from free text clinical notes and features extracted from two databases on known usage (Medi-Span and DrugBank). We trained a highly accurate predictive model that detects novel off-label uses among 1,602 unique drugs and 1,472 unique indications. We validated 403 predicted uses across independent data sources. Finally, we prioritize well-supported novel usages for further investigation on the basis of drug safety and cost.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualData MiningModels, TheoreticalOff-Label UsePattern Recognition, Automated

Identifiers

PMID24586689
PMCPMC3929699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.