Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586634›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Geographic variation in sexual attraction of Spodoptera frugiperda corn- and rice-strain males to pheromone lures.

Melanie Unbehend, Sabine Hänniger, Gissella M Vásquez, María Laura Juárez, Dominic Reisig, Jeremy N McNeil, Robert L Meagher, David A Jenkins, David G Heckel, Astrid T Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing fall armyworm (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Fall ArmywormFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Melanie UnbehendDepartment of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Jena, Germany.
Sabine HännigerDepartment of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Jena, Germany.
Gissella M VásquezDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
María Laura JuárezSección Zoología Agrícola, Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Las Talitas, Tucumán, Argentina.
Dominic ReisigDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Plymouth, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jeremy N McNeilDepartment of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Robert L MeagherInsect Behavior and Biocontrol Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
David A JenkinsTropical Crops and Germplasm Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico.
David G HeckelDepartment of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Jena, Germany.
Astrid T GrootDepartment of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPICE), Jena, Germany ; Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The corn- and rice-strains of Spodoptera frugiperda exhibit several genetic and behavioral differences and appear to be undergoing ecological speciation in sympatry. Previous studies reported conflicting results when investigating male attraction to pheromone lures in different regions, but this could have been due to inter-strain and/or geographic differences. Therefore, we investigated whether corn- and rice-strain males differed in their response to different synthetic pheromone blends in different regions in North America, the Caribbean and South America. All trapped males were strain-typed by two strain-specific mitochondrial DNA markers. In the first experiment, we found a nearly similar response of corn- and rice-strain males to two different 4-component blends, resembling the corn- and rice-strain female blend we previously described from females in Florida. This response showed some geographic variation in fields in Canada, North Carolina, Florida, Puerto Rico, and South America (Peru, Argentina). In dose-response experiments with the critical secondary sex pheromone component (Z)-7-dodecenyl acetate (Z7-12:OAc), we found some strain-specific differences in male attraction. While the response to Z7-12:OAc varied geographically in the corn-strain, rice-strain males showed almost no variation. We also found that the minor compound (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11-16:OAc) did not increase attraction of both strains in Florida and of corn-strain males in Peru. In a fourth experiment, where we added the stereo-isomer of the critical sex pheromone component, (E)-7-dodecenyl acetate, to the major pheromone component (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:OAc), we found that this compound was attractive to males in North Carolina, but not to males in Peru. Overall, our results suggest that both strains show rather geographic than strain-specific differences in their response to pheromone lures, and that regional sexual communication differences might cause geographic differentiation between populations.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugGeographyLinear ModelsMaleNorth AmericaOryzaPuerto RicoSex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalSouth AmericaSpecies SpecificitySpodopteraZea maysSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID24586634
PMCPMC3929749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.