Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586601›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

MCPerm: a Monte Carlo permutation method for accurately correcting the multiple testing in a meta-analysis of genetic association studies.

Yongshuai Jiang, Lanying Zhang, Fanwu Kong, Mingming Zhang, Hongchao Lv, Guiyou Liu, Mingzhi Liao, Rennan Feng, Jin Li, Ruijie Zhang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in physiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yongshuai JiangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Lanying ZhangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Fanwu KongDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Mingming ZhangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Hongchao LvCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Guiyou LiuGenome Analysis Laboratory, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Mingzhi LiaoCollege of Life Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Rennan FengDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jin LiCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Ruijie ZhangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional permutation (TradPerm) tests are usually considered the gold standard for multiple testing corrections. However, they can be difficult to complete for the meta-analyses of genetic association studies based on multiple single nucleotide polymorphism loci as they depend on individual-level genotype and phenotype data to perform random shuffles, which are not easy to obtain. Most meta-analyses have therefore been performed using summary statistics from previously published studies. To carry out a permutation using only genotype counts without changing the size of the TradPerm P-value, we developed a Monte Carlo permutation (MCPerm) method. First, for each study included in the meta-analysis, we used a two-step hypergeometric distribution to generate a random number of genotypes in cases and controls. We then carried out a meta-analysis using these random genotype data. Finally, we obtained the corrected permutation P-value of the meta-analysis by repeating the entire process N times. We used five real datasets and five simulation datasets to evaluate the MCPerm method and our results showed the following: (1) MCPerm requires only the summary statistics of the genotype, without the need for individual-level data; (2) Genotype counts generated by our two-step hypergeometric distributions had the same distributions as genotype counts generated by shuffling; (3) MCPerm had almost exactly the same permutation P-values as TradPerm (r = 0.999; P<2.2e-16); (4) The calculation speed of MCPerm is much faster than that of TradPerm. In summary, MCPerm appears to be a viable alternative to TradPerm, and we have developed it as a freely available R package at CRAN: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MCPerm/index.html.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenetic Association StudiesMonte Carlo MethodGenotypeHaplotypesHumansMultiple SclerosisNeurodegenerative DiseasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSchizophreniaSoftware

Identifiers

PMID24586601
PMCPMC3931718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.