Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586564›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Prognostic relevance of urinary bladder cancer susceptibility loci.

Anne J Grotenhuis, Aleksandra M Dudek, Gerald W Verhaegh, J Alfred Witjes, Katja K Aben, Saskia L van der Marel, Sita H Vermeulen, Lambertus A Kiemeney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of smoking on the recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne J GrotenhuisDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Aleksandra M DudekDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerald W VerhaeghDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Alfred WitjesDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Katja K AbenDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ; Comprehensive Cancer Center The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Saskia L van der MarelDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sita H VermeulenDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ; Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lambertus A KiemeneyDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few years, susceptibility loci have been identified for urinary bladder cancer (UBC) through candidate-gene and genome-wide association studies. Prognostic relevance of most of these loci is yet unknown. In this study, we used data of the Nijmegen Bladder Cancer Study (NBCS) to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the prognostic relevance of all confirmed UBC susceptibility loci. Detailed clinical data concerning diagnosis, stage, treatment, and disease course of a population-based series of 1,602 UBC patients were collected retrospectively based on a medical file survey. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed, and log-rank tests calculated, to evaluate the association between 12 confirmed UBC susceptibility variants and recurrence and progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. Among muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer (MIBC) patients, association of these variants with overall survival was tested. Subgroup analyses by tumor aggressiveness and smoking status were performed in NMIBC patients. In the overall NMIBC group (n = 1,269), a statistically significant association between rs9642880 at 8q24 and risk of progression was observed (GT vs. TT: HR = 1.08 (95% CI: 0.76-1.54), GG vs. TT: HR = 1.81 (95% CI: 1.23-2.66), P for trend = 2.6 × 10(-3)). In subgroup analyses, several other variants showed suggestive, though non-significant, prognostic relevance for recurrence and progression in NMIBC and survival in MIBC. This study provides suggestive evidence that genetic loci involved in UBC etiology may influence disease prognosis. Elucidation of the causal variant(s) could further our understanding of the mechanism of disease, could point to new therapeutic targets, and might aid in improvement of prognostic tools.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleGenetic LociGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisRetrospective StudiesUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24586564
PMCPMC3934869
OpenAlexW2047227202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.