Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586465›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Pharmacist interventions for prophylactic antibiotic use in urological inpatients undergoing clean or clean-contaminated operations in a Chinese hospital.

Hai-Xia Zhang, Xin Li, Hai-Qin Huo, Pei Liang, Jin-Ping Zhang, Wei-Hong Ge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Value of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs [ASPs]: a systematic review.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hai-Xia ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Xin LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hai-Qin HuoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Pei LiangDepartment of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Jin-Ping ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Wei-Hong GeDepartment of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the impact and cost-benefit value of pharmacist interventions for prophylactic antibiotic use in surgical patients undergoing clean or clean-contaminated operations.

methodsA pre-to-post intervention study was performed in the Department of Urological Surgery of a tertiary hospital. Patients admitted from January through June 2011, undergoing clean or clean-contaminated surgery, served as the pre-intervention group; patients admitted from January through June 2012 formed the post-intervention group. Pharmacist interventions were performed for the surgeries in the post-intervention group. The criteria for the rational use of antibiotic prophylaxis were established by the hospital administration. The pharmacist interventions included real-time monitoring of medical records and controlling of the prescriptions of prophylactic antibiotics against the criteria. The pre- and post-intervention groups were then compared to evaluate the outcomes of the pharmacist interventions. A cost-benefit analysis was performed to determine the economic effects of implementing the pharmacist intervention on preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

resultsAfter the pharmacist intervention, a significant decrease was found in the rate of no indications for prophylactic antibiotic use (p = 0.004), the rate of broad-spectrum antibiotic use (p<0.001), the rate of drug replacement (p<0.001) and the rate of prolonged duration of prophylaxis (p<0.001). Significant reductions were observed in the mean antibiotic cost (p<0.001), the mean duration of antibiotic prophylaxis (p<0.001) and the mean number of antibiotics used (p<0.001). A significant increase was observed in the rate of correct choice of antibiotics (p<0.001). The ratio of the net mean cost savings for antibiotics to the mean cost of pharmacist time was approximately 18.79:1.

conclusionReal-time interventions provided by a clinical pharmacist promoted rational use of prophylactic antibiotics, with a significant reduction in antibiotic costs, thus leading to favorable economic outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHospitalsHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesUrologic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID24586465
PMCPMC3934870
OpenAlexW2050778685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.