ArticlePloS one2014
Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the Norway rat.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic insights into adaptive evolution of Island brown rats (Rattus norvegicus): evidence from Iturup Island in the Russian Far East.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Detection of Vkorc1 single nucleotide polymorphisms indicates the presence of anticoagulant rodenticide resistance in Australia's introduced ratsPest management science · 2025Article
- Adaptive divergence in reproductive seasonality and underlying physiological features fit Rattus norvegicus to live as opportunistic breeders.Integrative zoology · 2025Article
- New polymorphisms of Vkork1 gene related to anticoagulant resistance of rats and mice in Italy.Pest management science · 2025Article
- The discovery of novel variants reveals the genetic diversity and potential origin of Seoul orthohantavirus.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Morphological and molecular phylogenetic characterization ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023Article
- Population structure, dispersion patterns and genetic diversity of two major invasive and commensal zoonotic disease hosts (Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- VKORC1 mutations in rodent populations of a tropical city-state as an indicator of anticoagulant rodenticide resistance.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The origins of the domesticate brown rat (Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021Review
- Population genomics reveal rapid genetic differentiation in a recently invasive population of Rattus norvegicus.Frontiers in zoology · 2021Article
- Mice and Rats Display Different Ventilatory, Hematological, and Metabolic Features of Acclimatization to Hypoxia.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Bring Back the Rat!The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
- Genomic analyses reveal three independent introductions of the invasive brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) to the Faroe Islands.Heredity · 2020Article
- Brown rat demography reveals pre-commensal structure in eastern Asia before expansion into Southeast Asia.Genome research · 2019Article
- The Gambian epauletted fruit bat shows increased genetic divergence in the Ethiopian highlands and in an area of rapid urbanization.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Genomic analyses identify multiple Asian origins and deeply diverged mitochondrial clades in inbred brown rats (Evolutionary applications · 2018Article
- Molecular genetic diversity of Gongylonema neoplasticum (Fibiger & Ditlevsen, 1914) (Spirurida: Gongylonematidae) from rodents in Southeast Asia.Systematic parasitology · 2018Article
- Population Genomics Reveals Speciation and Introgression between Brown Norway Rats and Their Sibling Species.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Central Eastern Asia, foremost the area bordering northern China and Mongolia, has been thought to be the geographic region where Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) have originated. However recent fossil analyses pointed to their origin in southern China. Moreover, whereas analyses of fossils dated the species' origin as ∼ 1.2-1.6 million years ago (Mya), molecular analyses yielded ∼ 0.5-2.9 Mya. Here, to study the geographic origin of the Norway rat and its spread across the globe we analyzed new and all published mitochondrial DNA cytochrome-b (cyt-b; N = 156) and D-loop (N = 212) sequences representing wild rats from four continents and select inbred strains. Our results are consistent with an origin of the Norway rat in southern China ∼ 1.3 Mya, subsequent prehistoric differentiation and spread in China and Asia from an initially weakly structured ancestral population, followed by further spread and differentiation across the globe during historic times. The recent spreading occurred mostly from derived European populations rather than from archaic Asian populations. We trace laboratory strains to wild lineages from Europe and North America and these represent a subset of the diversity of the rat; leaving Asian lineages largely untapped as a resource for biomedical models. By studying rats from Europe we made the observation that mtDNA diversity cannot be interpreted without consideration of pest control and, possibly, the evolution of rodenticide resistance. However, demographic models explored by forward-time simulations cannot fully explain the low mtDNA diversity of European rats and lack of haplotype sharing with their source from Asia. Comprehensive nuclear marker analyses of a larger sample of Norway rats representing the world are needed to better resolve the evolutionary history of wild rats and of laboratory rats, as well as to better understand the evolution of anticoagulant resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.