ArticlePloS one2014
Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Altered reversal and extinction learning in the DMSXL mouse model of type I myotonic dystrophy (DM1): An exploratory study.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- The Impact of Pretraining on Autoshaping and Operant Acquisition in Rats is Significant but Transient.Learning and motivation · 2025Article
- Article
- Automating licking bias correction in a two-choice delayed match-to-sample task to accelerate learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A novel approach to the assessment of higher-order rule learning in male mice.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Visual discrimination and inhibitory control deficits in mouse models of Down syndrome: A pilot study using rodent touchscreen technology.Journal of neuroscience research · 2023Article
- Use of an Automated Mouse Touchscreen Platform for Quantification of Cognitive Deficits After Central Nervous System Injury.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Touchscreen cognitive deficits, hyperexcitability and hyperactivity in males and females using two models of Cdkl5 deficiency.Human molecular genetics · 2022Article
- Selection of Mice for Object Permanence Cognitive Task Solution.Neurology international · 2022Article
- New Insights on Gene by Environmental Effects of Drugs of Abuse in Animal Models Using GeneNetwork.Genes · 2022Article
- Image discrimination reversal learning is impaired by sleep deprivation in rats: Cognitive rigidity or fatigue?Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Repetitive and Inflexible Active Coping and Addiction-like Neuroplasticity in Stressed Mice of a Helplessness-Resistant Inbred Strain.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Selection of Laboratory Mice for the Cognitive Task Successful Solution and for the Inability to Solve It.Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2021Article
- Article
- Learning and reaction times in mouse touchscreen tests are differentially impacted by mutations in genes encoding postsynaptic interacting proteins SYNGAP1, NLGN3, DLGAP1, DLGAP2 and SHANK2.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2021Article
- Hippocampal Transcriptome-Wide Association Study Reveals Correlations Between Impaired Glutamatergic Synapse Pathway and Age-Related Hearing Loss in BXD-Recombinant Inbred Mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Dorsolateral striatum engagement during reversal learning.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- A molecular insight into the dissociable regulation of associative learning and motivation by the synaptic protein neuroligin-1.BMC biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Touchscreen-based systems are growing in popularity as a tractable, translational approach for studying learning and cognition in rodents. However, while mouse strains are well known to differ in learning across various settings, performance variation between strains in touchscreen learning has not been well described. The selection of appropriate genetic strains and backgrounds is critical to the design of touchscreen-based studies and provides a basis for elucidating genetic factors moderating behavior. Here we provide a quantitative foundation for visual discrimination and reversal learning using touchscreen assays across a total of 35 genotypes. We found significant differences in operant performance and learning, including faster reversal learning in DBA/2J compared to C57BL/6J mice. We then assessed DBA/2J and C57BL/6J for differential sensitivity to an environmental insult by testing for alterations in reversal learning following exposure to repeated swim stress. Stress facilitated reversal learning (selectively during the late stage of reversal) in C57BL/6J, but did not affect learning in DBA/2J. To dissect genetic factors underlying these differences, we phenotyped a family of 27 BXD strains generated by crossing C57BL/6J and DBA/2J. There was marked variation in discrimination, reversal and extinction learning across the BXD strains, suggesting this task may be useful for identifying underlying genetic differences. Moreover, different measures of touchscreen learning were only modestly correlated in the BXD strains, indicating that these processes are comparatively independent at both genetic and phenotypic levels. Finally, we examined the behavioral structure of learning via principal component analysis of the current data, plus an archival dataset, totaling 765 mice. This revealed 5 independent factors suggestive of "reversal learning," "motivation-related late reversal learning," "discrimination learning," "speed to respond," and "motivation during discrimination." Together, these findings provide a valuable reference to inform the choice of strains and genetic backgrounds in future studies using touchscreen-based tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.