ArticlePloS one2014
In their own words: treating very young BRCA1/2 mutation-positive women with care and caution.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Pooled it
- Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing on young adults: a systematic review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Pooled it
- Chatbot Intervention and Cancer Risk Knowledge in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer Predisposition: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Beyond BRCA: A scoping review of person-centred care for women diagnosed with a BRCA gene mutation.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Helping Patients Understand and Cope with BRCA Mutations.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Clinical analysis of 52 adolescent patients with ovarian masses ≥10 cm in diameter.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.Journal of family nursing · 2019Article
- BRACAVENIR: an observational study of expectations and coping in young women with high hereditary risk of breast and ovarian cancer.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2019Article
- Information and support needs of young women regarding breast cancer risk and genetic testing: adapting effective interventions for a novel population.Familial cancer · 2018Article
- Decision making and experiences of young adults undergoing presymptomatic genetic testing for familial cancer: a longitudinal grounded theory study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
- Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2017Review
- Quality of Life and Psychological State in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients Who Received BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing.PloS one · 2016Article
- Genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer risk in young adult women: Facilitating autonomy and informed decision making is key.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeYoung women who have been identified as carrying a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 face a unique set of challenges related to managing cancer risk during a demographically-dense stage of life. They may struggle with decision-making in the absence of clear age-specific guidelines for medical management and because they have not yet fully developed the capacity to make life-altering decisions confidently. This study sought a patient-centered perspective on the dilemmas faced by 18-24 year olds who completed BRCA1/2 gene mutation testing prior to their 25(th) birthdays. PATIENTS AND
methodThis study integrated qualitative data from three independent investigations of BRCA1/2-positive women recruited through cancer risk clinics, hospital-based research centers, and online organizations. All 32 participants were women aged 21-25 who tested positive for a BRCA1/2 gene mutation between 2 and 60 months prior to data collection. Investigators used techniques of grounded theory and interpretive description to conduct both within and cross-study analysis.
resultsParticipants expressed needs for (1) greater clarity in recommendations for screening and prevention before age 25, especially with consideration of early and regular exposure to radiation associated with mammography or to hormones used in birth control, and (2) ongoing contact with providers to discuss risk management protocols as they become available.
conclusionsHealth care needs during the young adult years evolve with the cognitive capacity to address abrupt and pressing change. Specific needs of women in this population include a desire to balance autonomous decision-making with supportive guidance, a need for clear, accurate and consistent medical recommendations. Optimally, these women are best cared for by a team of genetically-oriented providers as part of a sustained program of ongoing support, rather than seen in an episodic, crisis-driven fashion. A discussion of insurance issues and provider-patient cultural differences is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.