Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586269›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Anticancer compound plumbagin and its molecular targets: a structural insight into the inhibitory mechanisms using computational approaches.

Mohammad S Jamal, Shadma Parveen, Mohd A Beg, Mohd Suhail, Adeel G A Chaudhary, Ghazi A Damanhouri, Adel M Abuzenadah, Mohd Rehan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Anticancer Effects ofJournal of Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad S JamalKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Shadma ParveenBareilly College, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, Bareilly, U.P., India.
Mohd A BegKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohd SuhailKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Adeel G A ChaudharyKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ghazi A DamanhouriKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Adel M AbuzenadahKACST Technology Innovation Center in Personalized Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohd RehanKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SAKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology · SAM.J.P. Rohilkhand University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plumbagin (5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) is a naphthoquinone derivative from the roots of plant Plumbago zeylanica and belongs to one of the largest and diverse groups of plant metabolites. The anticancer and antiproliferative activities of plumbagin have been observed in animal models as well as in cell cultures. Plumbagin exerts inhibitory effects on multiple cancer-signaling proteins, however, the binding mode and the molecular interactions have not yet been elucidated for most of these protein targets. The present study is the first attempt to provide structural insights into the binding mode of plumbagin to five cancer signaling proteins viz. PI3Kγ, AKT1/PKBα, Bcl-2, NF-κB, and Stat3 using molecular docking and (un)binding simulation analysis. We validated plumbagin docking to these targets with previously known important residues. The study also identified and characterized various novel interacting residues of these targets which mediate the binding of plumbagin. Moreover, the exact modes of inhibition when multiple mode of inhibition existed was also shown. Results indicated that the engaging of these important interacting residues in plumbagin binding leads to inhibition of these cancer-signaling proteins which are key players in the pathogenesis of cancer and thereby ceases the progression of the disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicClass Ib Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinaseDatabases, PharmaceuticalHumansLigandsMiceModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationNaphthoquinonesNF-kappa BProtein BindingProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2STAT3 Transcription FactorAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicClass Ib Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinaseLigandsNaphthoquinonesNF-kappa BplumbaginProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2STAT3 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID24586269
PMCPMC3937309
OpenAlexW2007269370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.