Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586239›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Physical activity assessment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis compared to healthy controls: a technology-based approach.

Thijs Willem Swinnen, Tineke Scheers, Johan Lefevre, Wim Dankaerts, Rene Westhovens, Kurt de Vlam

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05504616 (Physical Activity in Axial Spondyloarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05504616 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Physical Activity in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Development and Implementation of an Evidence-Based Health Technology Approach to Improve Adherence to Recommended Guidelines

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled106ConditionsAxial SpondyloarthritisArmsHealth technology-based intervention strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thijs Willem SwinnenRheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Tineke ScheersDepartment of Kinesiology, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium ; Research Foundation Flanders, Brussel, Belgium.
Johan LefevreDepartment of Kinesiology, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Wim DankaertsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Rene WesthovensRheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kurt de VlamRheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraditionally, assessment in axial Spondyloarthritis (aSpA) includes the evaluation of the capacity to execute tasks, conceptualized as physical function. The role of physical activity, defined as movement-related energy expenditure, is largely unknown and almost exclusively studied using patient-reported outcome measures. The aims of this observational cross-sectional study are to compare physical activity between patients with aSpA and healthy controls (HC) and to evaluate the contribution of disease activity to physical activity differences between groups.

methodsForty patients with aSpA were matched by age, gender, period of data acquisition in terms of days and season to 40 HC. Physical activity was measured during five consecutive days (three weekdays and two weekend days) using ambulatory monitoring (SenseWear Armband). Self-reported disease activity was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Differences in physical activity between patients with aSpA and HC were examined with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and a mixed linear model. Difference scores between patients and HC were correlated with disease activity.

resultsAverage weekly physical activity level (Med(IQR); HC:1.54(1.41-1.73); aSpA:1.45(1.31-1.67),MET) and energy expenditure (HC:36.40(33.43-41.01); aSpA:34.55(31.08-39.41),MET.hrs/day) were significantly lower in patients with aSpA. Analyses across intensity levels revealed no significant differences between groups for inactivity and time spent at light or moderate physical activities. In contrast, weekly averages of vigorous (HC:4.02(1.20-12.60); aSpA:0.00(0.00-1.20),min/d), very vigorous physical activities (HC0.00(0.00-1.08); aSpA:0.00(0.00-0.00),mind/d) and moderate/(very)vigorous combined (HC2.41(1.62-3.48); aSpA:1.63(1.20-2.82),hrs/d) were significantly lower in patients with aSpA. Disease activity did not interact with differences in physical activity between patients with aSpA and HC, evidenced by non-significant and very low correlations (range: -0.06-0.17) between BASDAI and HC-aSpA patients' difference scores.

conclusionsPatients with aSpA exhibit lower physical activity compared to HC and these differences are independent of self-reported disease activity. Further research on PA in patients with aSpA should be prioritized.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivitySpondylarthritis

Identifiers

PMID24586239
PMCPMC3938397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.