Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586116›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2014

How do filamentous pathogens deliver effector proteins into plant cells?

Benjamin Petre, Sophien Kamoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic and Functional Characterization of anLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. SsPit2A/B Effectors fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A Novel Effector, FSE1, Regulates the Pathogenicity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Fungal biotechnology: From yesterday to tomorrow.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin PetreThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom ; INRA, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136, Champenoux, France.
Sophien KamounThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal and oomycete plant parasites are among the most devastating pathogens of food crops. These microbes secrete effector proteins inside plant cells to manipulate host processes and facilitate colonization. How these effectors reach the host cytoplasm remains an unclear and debated area of plant research. In this article, we examine recent conflicting findings that have generated discussion in the field. We also highlight promising approaches based on studies of both parasite and host during infection. Ultimately, this knowledge may inform future broad spectrum strategies for protecting crops from such pathogens.

Indexed as

AscomycotaBasidiomycotaCrops, AgriculturalFungal ProteinsHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlant DiseasesProtein TransportFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24586116
PMCPMC3934835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.