Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24586046›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014

Differential codon adaptation between dsDNA and ssDNA phages in Escherichia coli.

Shivapriya Chithambaram, Ramanandan Prabhakaran, Xuhua Xia

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Lytic Podovirus AP-20-A InfectingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A NovelMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. GlobalViruses · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shivapriya ChithambaramDepartment of Biology and Center for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ramanandan PrabhakaranDepartment of Biology and Center for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Xuhua XiaDepartment of Biology and Center for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada xxia@uottawa.ca.
University of Ottawa · CAOntario Genomics · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because phages use their host translation machinery, their codon usage should evolve toward that of highly expressed host genes. We used two indices to measure codon adaptation of phages to their host, rRSCU (the correlation in relative synonymous codon usage [RSCU] between phages and their host) and Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) computed with highly expressed host genes as the reference set (because phage translation depends on host translation machinery). These indices used for this purpose are appropriate only when hosts exhibit little mutation bias, so only phages parasitizing Escherichia coli were included in the analysis. For double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) phages, both r(RSCU) and CAI decrease with increasing number of transfer RNA genes encoded by the phage genome. r(RSCU) is greater for dsDNA phages than for single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) phages, and the low r(RSCU) values are mainly due to poor concordance in RSCU values for Y-ending codons between ssDNA phages and the E. coli host, consistent with the predicted effect of C→T mutation bias in the ssDNA phages. Strong C→T mutation bias would improve codon adaptation in codon families (e.g., Gly) where U-ending codons are favored over C-ending codons ("U-friendly" codon families) by highly expressed host genes but decrease codon adaptation in other codon families where highly expressed host genes favor C-ending codons against U-ending codons ("U-hostile" codon families). It is remarkable that ssDNA phages with increasing C→T mutation bias also increased the usage of codons in the "U-friendly" codon families, thereby achieving CAI values almost as large as those of dsDNA phages. This represents a new type of codon adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBacteriophagesCodonDNADNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularMutationRNA, TransferRNA, ViralCodonDNADNA, Single-StrandedRNA, TransferRNA, Viralbacteriophagecodon adaptationdeaminationEscherichia colimutation biasphage-host coevolution

Identifiers

PMID24586046
PMCPMC4032129
OpenAlexW2155131453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.