Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24585346›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2014

Somatic and mental health service use of children and adolescents in Germany (KiGGS-study).

Sebastian Wölfle, Diana Jost, Robert Oades, Robert Schlack, Heike Hölling, Johannes Hebebrand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pathways to a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in Germany: a survey of parents.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Challenges in children's enrolment to psychosocial services.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian WölfleDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Wickenburgstr. 21, 45047, Essen, Germany.
Diana Jost
Robert Oades
Robert Schlack
Heike Hölling
Johannes Hebebrand
Essen University Hospital · DERobert Koch Institute · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only a limited number of national surveys have investigated both somatic and mental health service use in children and adolescents. The current study aimed to assess service use in Germany as based on at least a single contact with a somatic (pediatrician, general practitioner, nonmedical practitioner) and/or mental health (psychiatrist, psychologist, youth welfare) care specialist within the last 12 months. Questionnaire responses of 6,475 children and adolescents aged 11.0-17.9 years and their parents were analyzed based on data ascertained by the German Child and Adolescent Health Survey (KiGGS) conducted between 2003 and 2006. For assessment of mental symptom loading the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was completed by parents, thus allowing the determination of the relationship between symptom loading and service use. ANOVA and logistic regression were performed to determine help-seeking behavior overall and of different health professional groups upon inclusion of the SDQ Total Difficulties score, gender, age and socio-economic status (SES). A total of 81.9 % of all children and adolescents had used any kind of service within the past 12 months. Seventy-seven percent and 0.8 % used only the somatic and mental health services, respectively; 4.1 % had frequented both services. Amongst youths with a 'borderline' and 'abnormal' Total Difficulties score, 11.8 and 18.6 %, respectively, sought help from mental health partners. Age, SES and Total Difficulties score were predictors of any service use; the logistic regression model explained 7.6 % of the variance. Use of mental health service was significantly predicted by only age and Total Difficulties score, the respective model explained 26.2 % of the variance. The comparison of health services use on an international level is rendered difficult by national differences in health-care provision. Nevertheless, several of our findings are similar to results obtained in other nationally representative surveys.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent PsychiatryAnalysis of VarianceChildChild PsychiatryFemaleGermanyHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePreventive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID24585346
OpenAlexW2019820524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.