Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24585129›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2014

Measuring individual quality of life in patients receiving radiation therapy: the SEIQoL-Questionnaire.

Gerhild Becker, Constanze S Merk, Cornelia Meffert, Felix Momm

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ThePalliative medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring health-related quality of life of Spanish domestic adult adoptees: sociodemographic characteristics, chronic medical conditions, and gender differences.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  11. Individualized quality of life of severely affected multiple sclerosis patients: practicability and value in comparison with standard inventories.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gerhild BeckerPalliative Care Research Group, Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Constanze S Merk
Cornelia Meffert
Felix Momm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuality of life (QoL) is one of the most important outcomes in cancer care. Although a number of instruments to measure health-related QoL (HRQoL) exist, there are few suitable instruments to measure individual QoL. The best established instrument is the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL). The disadvantage of this questionnaire is its use of semi-structured interviews, which are very time-consuming. The purpose of our study was to transform the SEIQoL into an economical instrument that can be used in clinical trials with large samples.

methodsWe developed the SEIQoL-Questionnaire (SEIQoL-Q) on the basis of the SEIQoL-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) by transforming the interview guide into a written questionnaire. Patients (N = 1,108) in all three phases of radiation treatment (first consultation, ongoing irradiation, and aftercare) were asked to complete the SEIQoL-Q and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30.

resultsWhile the average HRQoL measured by the QLQ-C30 was 55.6, the average SEIQoL-Q index was 59.6. The most important life domain was "physical health," followed by "emotional well-being" and "family." Patients attributed the highest level of satisfaction to "home/housing," followed by "family" and "partnership." Male patients were shown to have a significantly better QoL than females. The SEIQoL-Q index correlates moderately with the QLQ-C30 functioning scale "global quality of life" [r = .42 (p < .001)].

conclusionsAccording to our findings, the SEIQoL-Q appears to be a feasible and economical instrument for use in quantitative research among cancer patients in different stages of their disease.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPsychometrics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.