ArticlePeritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
Intraperitoneal fluid overestimates hydration status assessment by bioimpedance spectroscopy.
Article in Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of peritoneal dialysate on bioelectrical impedance analysis variability in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Review
- Phase Angle as a Risk Factor for Mortality in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis.Nutrients · 2023Article
- A comparison of fluid status determination using bioelectric impedance and the isotope dilution method in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.Renal failure · 2022Article
- Bioimpedance spectroscopy for fluid status assessment in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis: Implications for peritoneal dialysis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Classification of Hydration in Clinical Conditions: Indirect and Direct Approaches Using Bioimpedance.Nutrients · 2019Review
- Dialysis vintage stratified comparison of body composition, hydration and nutritional state in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2018Article
- Pedal edema and jugular venous pressure for volume overload in peritoneal dialysis patients.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2016Article
- Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Associations with Body Composition, Peritoneal Transport, and Peritoneal Glucose Absorption.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015Article
- Fluid in the Peritoneal Cavity When Measuring Bioimpedance.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal DialysisArticle
- Bioimpedance spectroscopy: Is a picture worth a thousand words?Seminars in dialysisArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a valuable tool to assess nutrition and volume status in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, data about the influence of intraperitoneal fluid on body composition measures are conflicting, and there is no clear consensus about whether the abdomen should be drained before the procedure. We designed a comparison study to detect the influence of intra-abdominal fluid on BIS results.
methodsWe performed 73 pairs of BIS measurements in 34 stable PD patients, first with the peritoneum filled with a 1.36% glucose dialysate solution and then after the solution was drained. Patients stayed in the supine position for 10 minutes before the BIS procedure, and the electrodes were not moved between measures. Clinical and demographic data were collected, as were analytic parameters of nutrition and volume status.
resultsFluid overload is overestimated when BIS is performed with a full abdomen (1.82 ± 1.73 L vs 1.64 ± 1.68 L, p = 0.043). We also found a spurious overestimation in extracellular water (16.40 ± 3.21 L vs 16.24 ± 3.16 L, p < 0.001) and in relative overhydration (8.29% ± 6.96% vs 7.14% ± 6.79%, p = 0.017). No differences in intracellular water or parameters of nutrition were found. We observed negative correlations for the extracellular water overestimation with age (r = -0.245, p = 0.037), serum B-type natriuretic peptide (r = -0.366, p = 0.036), body mass index (r = -0.248, p = 0.035), and lean tissue index (r = -0.427, p = 0.001). The difference in extracellular water correlated only with body mass index (r = -0.259, p = 0.039). We also found that, assessed at 50 KHz, whole-body impedance (-4.52 ± 8.37, p = 0.001) and phase angle (-0.08 ± 0.23 degrees, p = 0.002) were both lower when BIS was performed in patients with a full abdomen.
conclusionsFluid overload is overestimated by BIS when performed in patients with dialysate in the peritoneum. The observed differences are greater in younger, more poorly nourished, or less overhydrated patients. If more precise results are required, we suggest that the abdomen be drained before BIS is performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.