ArticlePeritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
Development and Testing of Self-Management Scale for PD Patients.
Article in Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Psychometric Testing of the Patient Safety Scale for Home Peritoneal Dialysis (PD-PSS).Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2026Article
- A Psychometric Network Analysis of Fear of Progression, Coping Styles, and Self-Management Among Patients Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
- Effect of Patient-Empowerment Interaction Model on Self-Management Ability of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Factors Associated with Self-Management of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in Urumqi of Xinjiang of China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Development and validation of self-management scale for tuberculosis patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- The association between self-management ability and malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis syndrome in peritoneal dialysis patients: a cross-sectional study.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
- Association between keeping home records of catheter exit-site and incidence of peritoneal dialysis-related infections.International urology and nephrology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and evaluate the self-management scale for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.
methodsThe item pool was formulated based on literature reviews and in-depth interviews. An initial scale containing five factors and 44 items was constructed through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation and a preliminary test. A total of 313 PD patients from the Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Shanghai area were surveyed to test the reliability and validity of the scale.
resultsFive factors, namely solution bag replacement, troubleshooting during operation, diet management, complication monitoring, emotion management and return to social life, were extracted by exploratory factor analysis: the 28 items could explain 64.567% of the total variance; the content validity index was 0.963; the Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half coefficient were 0.926 and 0.960 respectively; and test-retest reliability was 0.937.
conclusionThe scale has been proved to be a reliable and valid tool which allows PD nurses to evaluate the self-management ability of PD patients. The evaluation outcomes can serve as a basis for individualized nursing plans and interventions so as to provide highly effective nursing care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.