Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24584614›Full record

ArticlePeritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis

Can EPS development be avoided with early interventions? The potential role of tamoxifen--a single-center study.

Erika De Sousa-Amorim, Gloria Del Peso, M Auxiliadora Bajo, Laura Alvarez, Marta Ossorio, Fernando Gil, Teresa Bellon, Rafael Selgas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is there an end in sight for encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis?Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erika De Sousa-AmorimServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño; and Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Gloria Del PesoServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño; and Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
M Auxiliadora BajoServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño; and Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Laura AlvarezServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño; and Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Marta OssorioServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño; and Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando GilServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño; and Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Teresa BellonServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño; and Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael SelgasServicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid; Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño; and Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital San Pedro · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEncapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a severe complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Identification of patients at high risk for EPS ("EPS-prone") and delivery of appropriate interventions might prevent its development. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of all EPS and EPS-prone patients diagnosed at our PD unit.

methodsFor a 30-year period representing our entire PD experience, we retrospectively identified all patients with EPS (diagnosed according to International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis criteria) and all patients defined as EPS-prone because they met at least 2 established criteria (severe peritonitis, PD vintage greater than 3 years, severe hemoperitoneum, overexposure to glucose, and acquired ultrafiltration failure).

resultsOf 679 PD patients, we identified 20 with EPS, for an overall prevalence of 2.9%. Mean age at diagnosis was 50.2 ± 16.4 years, with a median PD time of 77.96 months (range: 44.36 - 102.7 months) and a median follow-up of 30.91 months (range: 4.6 - 68.75 months). Of patients with EPS, 10 (50%) received tamoxifen, 10 (50%) received parenteral nutrition, and 2 (10%) underwent adhesiolysis, with 25% mortality related to EPS. Another 14 patients were identified as EPS-prone. Median follow-up was 54.05 months (range: 11.9 - 87.04 months). All received tamoxifen, and 5 (36%) received corticosteroids; none progressed to full EPS. We observed no differences in baseline data between the groups, but the group with EPS had been on PD longer (84 ± 53 months vs 39 ± 20 months, p = 0.002) and had a higher cumulative number of days of peritoneal inflammation from peritonitis (17.2 ± 11.1 days vs 9.8 ± 7.9 days, p = 0.015). Overall mortality was similar in the groups. The incidence of EPS declined during our three decades of experience (5.6%, 3.9%, and 0.3%).

conclusionsBeing a serious, life-threatening complication of PD, EPS requires high suspicion to allow for prompt diagnosis and treatment. Early detection of EPS-prone states and delivery of appropriate intervention might prevent EPS development. Tamoxifen seems to be a key strategy in prevention, but caution should be used in interpreting our results. Additional randomized controlled studies are needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualEarly DiagnosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPeritoneal DialysisPeritoneal FibrosisPrimary PreventionTamoxifenEncapsulating peritoneal sclerosisEPSEPS-prone statesperitonitistamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID24584614
PMCPMC4164402
OpenAlexW2158992800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.