ArticleMolecular biology reports2014
Gene cloning and expression analysis of IRF1 in half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis).
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Analysis of IRF1 Reveals its Role in the Activation of the Type I IFN Pathway in Golden Pompano,International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- First Study on Interferon Regulatory Factor in Sturgeon: Expression Pattern of Interferon Regulatory Factor in Dabry's Sturgeon Acipenser dabryanus.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) was known to play key roles in antiviral defense in several species, and some other important biological processes. In this report, full length cDNA of IRF1 from Cynoglossus semilaevis (CsIRF1) was identified. It was of 1,455 bp, containing a 5' UTR of 104 bp, a 3' UTR of 541 bp with a poly (A) tail and an ORF of 810 bp encoding a putative protein of 269 amino acids. The putative CsIRF1protein contained one conserved IRF domain (1-113aa), and two low complexity regions (140-158aa and 230-242aa, respectively). Phylogenetic analysis showed that CsIRF1 was conserved in the teleost evolutionary branch, which was independent of mammalian, birds and amphibians. Additionally, CsIRF1 had the 96% homology with marine fishes, while 66% with freshwater fishes. The expression profiles of CsIRF1was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR in healthy tissues and in immune tissues challenged with different pathogens [Vibrio anguillarum and Lymphocystis disease virus (LCDV)], respectively. CsIRF1 was widely expressed in healthy tissues of Cynoglossus semilaevis and with the highest expression in blood, as much as 19 times of that in liver. V. anguillarum and LCDV both induced the CsIRF1 gene expression distinctly in liver, with the peak value reached to 98-fold at 6 h and 25-fold at 24 h, respectively. The bacteria induced CsIRF1 suddenly up-expression in each detected tissues. However, at the initial stage of the challenge of virus LCDV, the CsIRF1 expression in blood and spleen were up regulated; on the contrary, its expression in liver and head kidney were down regulated, 0.3 and 0.4-fold 6 h post virus injection, respectively. These results suggested that CsIRF1 gene might involve in not only antiviral activity but also antibacterial procedure, indicating its vital role in Cynoglossus semilaevis innate defense system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.