Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24583760›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Changing community health service delivery in economically less-developed rural areas in China: impact on service use and satisfaction.

Yong Liu, Zhaokang Yuan, Yuxi Liu, Upali W Jayasinghe, Mark F Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient Satisfaction with Rural Medical Services: A Cross-Sectional Survey in 11 Western Provinces in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Outpatient Satisfaction with Tertiary Hospitals in China: The Role of Sociodemographic Characteristics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yong LiuSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Zhaokang Yuan
Yuxi Liu
Upali W Jayasinghe
Mark F Harris

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a model of rural community health service (CHS) on the use and acceptability of primary healthcare services.

designQuasi-experimental.

settingTwo adjacent rural counties in China.

participants5842 residents in 2009 and 3807 in 2010 from 980 households in 7 intervention townships and 49 villages; 2232 residents in 2009 and 2315 in 2010 from 628 households in 3 comparison townships and 9 villages. All residents were approached to participate, with no significant differences in age or sex between groups.

interventionMultilevel intervention in 2009 including training rural practitioners, encouraging clinic improvements, providing clinical guidelines, standards and subsidies. DATA COLLECTION: Surveys of community members from randomly sampled households in 2009 and 2010. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with and utilisation of outpatient and public health services. ANALYSIS: Factor analysis confirmed two components of satisfaction. Univariate and multilevel analysis was used.

resultsSatisfaction scores for intervention county respondents increased from 21.4 (95% CI 21.1 to 21.7) to 22.1 (95% CI 21.7 to 22.4) with no change in comparison area. In multilevel analysis, satisfaction with patient-centred care was associated with chronic disease, shorter waiting times and county. Satisfaction with clinic environment and cost was associated with female gender, shorter waiting times but not county. The proportion of children receiving immunisation in intervention village clinics increased from 42.5% (95% CI 27.9% to 47.1%) to 59.2% (95% CI 53.8% to 64.6%) whereas this decreased in comparison villages (16.5%; 95% CI 10.3% to 22.7% to 6.0%; 95% CI 1.3% to 10.7%). Antenatal visits increased in intervention villages (from 69.0%, 95% CI 65.8% to 73.1% to 75.8%, 95% CI 72.2% to 79.4%) with no change in comparison villages.

conclusionsIntroduction of a CHS model adapted to economically less-developed rural areas was associated with some improvements in satisfaction with care and use of some village-based public health services. Further research is needed to determine its public health impact and application to other areas.

Indexed as

Models, OrganizationalPatient SatisfactionChinaCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareHealth PlanningHealth Services ResearchHumansPoverty AreasPublic HealthRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesPrimary CarePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID24583760
PMCPMC3939668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.