ArticleBMJ open2014
Changing community health service delivery in economically less-developed rural areas in China: impact on service use and satisfaction.
Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Community-integrated noncommunicable disease service models: lessons from China.Journal of global health · 2025Pooled it
- Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Pooled it
- Health and health system impacts of China's comprehensive primary healthcare reforms: a systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2023Pooled it
- Support measures and demand among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey in high-workload provinces of China, 2023.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Public satisfaction with Healthy China Action Plan implementation: a web-based cross-sectional survey in southwest China.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Strengthening the effectiveness of community health system: Assessing the factors that enhance or constrain the delivery of health services within communities in Nigeria.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Outpatients' satisfaction with healthcare services received at a district hospital in Botswana.Ghana medical journal · 2022Observational
- Patient satisfaction and its health provider-related determinants in primary health facilities in rural China.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic inequality in public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China: a quantile regression analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
- Urban-rural differences in China's crude death rate changes.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Maternal mortality ratio in China from 1990 to 2019: trends, causes and correlations.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Ranking the Healthcare Resource Factors for Public Satisfaction with Health System in China-Based on the Grey Relational Analysis Models.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Current Status and Associated Factors of Depression and Anxiety Among the Chinese Residents During the Period of Low Transmission of COVID-19.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- An application of ARIMA model for predicting total health expenditure in China from 1978-2022.Journal of global health · 2020Article
- Public satisfaction with the healthcare system in China during 2013-2015: a cross-sectional survey of the associated factors.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Patient Satisfaction with Rural Medical Services: A Cross-Sectional Survey in 11 Western Provinces in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Outpatient Satisfaction with Tertiary Hospitals in China: The Role of Sociodemographic Characteristics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Article
- Equity in health financing of Guangxi after China's universal health coverage: evidence based on health expenditure comparison in rural Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region from 2009 to 2013.International journal for equity in health · 2017Article
- The impact of predisposing, enabling, and need factors in utilization of health services among rural residents in Guangxi, China.BMC health services research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a model of rural community health service (CHS) on the use and acceptability of primary healthcare services.
designQuasi-experimental.
settingTwo adjacent rural counties in China.
participants5842 residents in 2009 and 3807 in 2010 from 980 households in 7 intervention townships and 49 villages; 2232 residents in 2009 and 2315 in 2010 from 628 households in 3 comparison townships and 9 villages. All residents were approached to participate, with no significant differences in age or sex between groups.
interventionMultilevel intervention in 2009 including training rural practitioners, encouraging clinic improvements, providing clinical guidelines, standards and subsidies. DATA COLLECTION: Surveys of community members from randomly sampled households in 2009 and 2010. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with and utilisation of outpatient and public health services. ANALYSIS: Factor analysis confirmed two components of satisfaction. Univariate and multilevel analysis was used.
resultsSatisfaction scores for intervention county respondents increased from 21.4 (95% CI 21.1 to 21.7) to 22.1 (95% CI 21.7 to 22.4) with no change in comparison area. In multilevel analysis, satisfaction with patient-centred care was associated with chronic disease, shorter waiting times and county. Satisfaction with clinic environment and cost was associated with female gender, shorter waiting times but not county. The proportion of children receiving immunisation in intervention village clinics increased from 42.5% (95% CI 27.9% to 47.1%) to 59.2% (95% CI 53.8% to 64.6%) whereas this decreased in comparison villages (16.5%; 95% CI 10.3% to 22.7% to 6.0%; 95% CI 1.3% to 10.7%). Antenatal visits increased in intervention villages (from 69.0%, 95% CI 65.8% to 73.1% to 75.8%, 95% CI 72.2% to 79.4%) with no change in comparison villages.
conclusionsIntroduction of a CHS model adapted to economically less-developed rural areas was associated with some improvements in satisfaction with care and use of some village-based public health services. Further research is needed to determine its public health impact and application to other areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.