Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24583089›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2014

Past strategies and future directions for identifying AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) modulators.

Sarah E Sinnett, Jay E Brenman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Inhibition of AMPK activation inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E SinnettNeurobiology Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), United States.
Jay E BrenmanUNC Neuroscience Center, United States; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, UNC, United States. Electronic address: brenman@med.unc.edu.
Center for Neurosciences · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Genetic Elucidation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling MechanismsR01NS080108 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRENMAN, JAY · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS080108NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS080108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a promising therapeutic target for cancer, type II diabetes, and other illnesses characterized by abnormal energy utilization. During the last decade, numerous labs have published a range of methods for identifying novel AMPK modulators. The current understanding of AMPK structure and regulation, however, has propelled a paradigm shift in which many researchers now consider ADP to be an additional regulatory nucleotide of AMPK. How can the AMPK community apply this new understanding of AMPK signaling to translational research? Recent insights into AMPK structure, regulation, and holoenzyme-sensitive signaling may provide the hindsight needed to clearly evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of past AMPK drug discovery efforts. Improving future strategies for AMPK drug discovery will require pairing the current understanding of AMPK signaling with improved experimental designs.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAMP-Activated Protein KinasesAnimalsHoloenzymesHumansIsoenzymesProtein Kinase InhibitorsAMP-Activated Protein KinasesHoloenzymesIsoenzymesProtein Kinase InhibitorsAMPKDephosphorylation inhibitionDrug discoveryHigh-throughput screeningNucleotide analogsRegulatory fragment

Identifiers

PMID24583089
PMCPMC3991011
OpenAlexW2008828239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.