Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24582909›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2014

Evaluation of sex differences in cannabinoid dependence.

Julie A Marusich, Timothy W Lefever, Kateland R Antonazzo, Rebecca M Craft, Jenny L Wiley

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis in Cannabis Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Highway to hell or magic smoke? The dose-dependence of ΔLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pharmacotherapy for Cannabis Use Disorder: Preclinical and Clinical Models.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Differential disruption of response alternation by precipitated ΔPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Sex and Gender Interactions on the Use and Impact of Recreational Cannabis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sex-Dependent Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: A Translational Perspective.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie A MarusichRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.
Timothy W LefeverRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.
Kateland R AntonazzoRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.
Rebecca M CraftDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4820, USA.
Jenny L WileyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. Electronic address: jwiley@rti.org.
RTI International · USWashington State University · US

Funding

Sex Differences in Cannabinoid Dependence and Analgesia (parent grant)R01DA016644 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WILEY, JENNY L. · 2004 to 2016
$3.9M
NIDA NIH HHS DA-016644NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic recreational marijuana users often report withdrawal symptoms when trying to quit, with some reports suggesting withdrawal may be more pronounced in women. In animal models, female rodents show enhanced sensitivity to acute Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) administration, but chronic administration has been studied little.

methodsSex differences in THC dependence in rats were examined. Adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were administered 30 mg/kg THC or vehicle twice daily for 6.5 days. On day 7, rats were challenged with vehicle or rimonabant, counterbalanced across dosing groups, and were assessed for withdrawal-related behaviors.

resultsDuring chronic THC dosing, disruption of estrous cycling and weight loss (both sexes) were observed. Whereas overt signs of withdrawal were minimal in THC-treated rats challenged with vehicle, rimonabant precipitated a pronounced withdrawal syndrome in THC-dependent rats that was characterized by changes in a number of domains, including somatic (paw tremors, head twitches, and retropulsion), early-stage cognition (lack of locomotor habituation, disrupted prepulse inhibition), and affective (increased startle reactivity). With the exception of increased retropulsion in female rats, sex differences were not noted. In vehicle-treated rats, rimonabant induced puritis.

conclusionsThis study represents the first examination of THC dependence in adult rats of both sexes, extends previous findings to females, and revealed some sex differences. The results suggest that the changes that occur during precipitated withdrawal from THC extend beyond somatic signs to more nuanced disruptions of cognitive and affective functioning. The breadth of withdrawal signs observed in rodents mirrors those that have been observed in humans.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsCannabinoidsDronabinolFemaleMaleRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySensory GatingSubstance-Related DisordersSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeCannabinoidsDronabinolDependenceRimonabantSex differencesΔ(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol

Identifiers

PMID24582909
PMCPMC3971653
OpenAlexW2033378668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.