Trial reportMayo Clinic proceedings2014
Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave myocardial revascularization therapy for refractory angina pectoris.
Trial report in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of cardiac shock wave therapy plus optimal medical therapy on rehospitalization in patients with severe coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy for Coronary Heart Disease: an Updated Meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2018Pooled it
- Cardiac shock-wave therapy in the treatment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of Permanent Right Internal Mammary Artery Closure on Coronary Collateral Function and Myocardial Ischemia.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2017Trial
- Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial therapy is efficacious in improving symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris--a multicenter study.Coronary artery disease · 2015Trial
- Low-dose extracorporeal shock wave attenuates sepsis-related acute lung injury by targeting mitochondrial dysfunction and pyroptosis crosstalk in type II alveolar epithelial cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- A prospective randomized controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves therapy for primary prevention of subclinical cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients without a cardiovascular risk treated with doxorubicin.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Cardioprotective effects of shock wave therapy: A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study on acute ischemia-reperfusion injury.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Cardiac Shockwave Therapy - A Novel Therapy for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Global Research Trends in Shock Wave for Therapy from 1990 to 2019: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Non-pharmacological Treatment of Refractory Angina and Microvascular Angina.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Cardiac shock wave therapy protects cardiomyocytes from hypoxia‑induced injury by modulating miR‑210.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease: Relationship of Symptom Amelioration and Ischemia Improvement.Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2018Article
- Low-Energy Shockwave Therapy Improves Ischemic Kidney Microcirculation.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016Article
- Cardiac shockwave therapy in patients with chronic refractory angina pectoris.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2016Article
- Low-Energy Shockwave Treatment Promotes Endothelial Progenitor Cell Homing to the Stenotic Pig Kidney.Cell transplantationArticle
- The beneficial effect of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization in patients with refractory angina.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) therapy in treating patients with refractory angina pectoris. PATIENTS AND
methodsA single-arm multicenter prospective trial to assess safety and efficacy of the ESMR therapy in patients with refractory angina (class III/IV angina) was performed. Screening exercise treadmill tests and pharmacological single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were performed for all patients to assess exercise capacity and ischemic burden. Patients were treated with 9 sessions of ESMR to ischemic areas over 9 weeks. Efficacy end points were exercise capacity by using treadmill test as well as ischemic burden on pharmacological SPECT at 4 months after the last ESMR treatment. Safety measures included electrocardiography, echocardiography, troponin, creatine kinase, and brain natriuretic peptide testing, and pain questionnaires.
resultsFifteen patients with medically refractory angina and no revascularization options were enrolled. There was a statistically significant mean increase of 122.3±156.9 seconds (38% increase compared with baseline; P=.01) in exercise treadmill time from baseline (319.8±157.2 seconds) to last follow-up after the ESMR treatment (422.1±183.3 seconds). There was no improvement in the summed stress perfusion scores after pharmacologically induced stress SPECT at 4 months after the last ESMR treatment in comparison to that at screening; however, SPECT summed stress score revealed that untreated areas had greater progression in ischemic burden vs treated areas (3.69±6.2 vs 0.31±4.5; P=.03). There was no significant change in the mean summed echo score from baseline to posttreatment (0.4±5.1; P=.70). The ESMR therapy was performed safely without any adverse events in electrocardiography, echocardiography, troponins, creatine kinase, or brain natriuretic peptide. Pain during the ESMR treatment was minimal (a score of 0.5±1.2 to 1.1±1.2 out of 10).
conclusionIn this multicenter feasibility study, ESMR seems to be a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris. However, larger sham-controlled trials will be required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.