Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24582193›Full record

Trial reportMayo Clinic proceedings2014

Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave myocardial revascularization therapy for refractory angina pectoris.

Andrew Cassar, Megha Prasad, Martin Rodriguez-Porcel, Guy S Reeder, Darshak Karia, Anthony N DeMaria, Amir Lerman

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Low-Energy Shockwave Therapy Improves Ischemic Kidney Microcirculation.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016
    Article
  16. Cardiac shockwave therapy in patients with chronic refractory angina pectoris.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The beneficial effect of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization in patients with refractory angina.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew CassarDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Megha PrasadDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Martin Rodriguez-PorcelDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Guy S ReederDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Darshak KariaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Anthony N DeMariaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Amir LermanDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: lerman.amir@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USEinstein Medical Center Philadelphia · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Ultrasound Shockwave Therapy for Post-Stenotic Microvascular RemodelingR01HL123160 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LERMAN, AMIR, LERMAN, LILACH O · 2015 to 2018
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL123160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) therapy in treating patients with refractory angina pectoris. PATIENTS AND

methodsA single-arm multicenter prospective trial to assess safety and efficacy of the ESMR therapy in patients with refractory angina (class III/IV angina) was performed. Screening exercise treadmill tests and pharmacological single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were performed for all patients to assess exercise capacity and ischemic burden. Patients were treated with 9 sessions of ESMR to ischemic areas over 9 weeks. Efficacy end points were exercise capacity by using treadmill test as well as ischemic burden on pharmacological SPECT at 4 months after the last ESMR treatment. Safety measures included electrocardiography, echocardiography, troponin, creatine kinase, and brain natriuretic peptide testing, and pain questionnaires.

resultsFifteen patients with medically refractory angina and no revascularization options were enrolled. There was a statistically significant mean increase of 122.3±156.9 seconds (38% increase compared with baseline; P=.01) in exercise treadmill time from baseline (319.8±157.2 seconds) to last follow-up after the ESMR treatment (422.1±183.3 seconds). There was no improvement in the summed stress perfusion scores after pharmacologically induced stress SPECT at 4 months after the last ESMR treatment in comparison to that at screening; however, SPECT summed stress score revealed that untreated areas had greater progression in ischemic burden vs treated areas (3.69±6.2 vs 0.31±4.5; P=.03). There was no significant change in the mean summed echo score from baseline to posttreatment (0.4±5.1; P=.70). The ESMR therapy was performed safely without any adverse events in electrocardiography, echocardiography, troponins, creatine kinase, or brain natriuretic peptide. Pain during the ESMR treatment was minimal (a score of 0.5±1.2 to 1.1±1.2 out of 10).

conclusionIn this multicenter feasibility study, ESMR seems to be a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris. However, larger sham-controlled trials will be required to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAngina PectorisEchocardiographyExercise TestFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHigh-Energy Shock WavesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationPilot ProjectsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24582193
PMCPMC6124893
OpenAlexW2096114984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.