Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24581929›Full record

Trial reportPatient education and counseling2014

Presenting efficacy information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.

Amie C O'Donoghue, Helen W Sullivan, Kathryn J Aikin, Dhuly Chowdhury, Rebecca R Moultrie, Douglas J Rupert

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Effect of Including Quantitative Information on Multiple Endpoints in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Television Advertisements.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of direct-to-consumer drug advertising during the Super Bowl on drug utilization.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Attention to and Distraction from Risk Information in Prescription Drug Advertising: An Eye Tracking Study.Journal of public policy & marketing : JPP&M : an annual publication of the Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, the University of Michigan · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An Empirical Examination of the FDAAA-Mandated "Toll-Free Statement" for Consumer Reporting of Side Effects in Direct-to-Consumer Television Advertisements.Journal of public policy & marketing : JPP&M : an annual publication of the Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, the University of Michigan · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amie C O'DonoghueU.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. Electronic address: amie.odonoghue@fda.hhs.gov.
Helen W SullivanU.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA.
Kathryn J AikinU.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA.
Dhuly ChowdhuryRTI International, USA.
Rebecca R MoultrieRTI International, USA.
Douglas J RupertRTI International, USA.

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluated whether presenting prescription drug efficacy information in direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising helps individuals accurately report a drug's benefits and, if so, which numerical format is most helpful.

methodsWe conducted a randomized, controlled study of individuals diagnosed with high cholesterol (n=2807) who viewed fictitious prescription drug print or television ads containing either no drug efficacy information or efficacy information in one of five numerical formats. We measured drug efficacy recall, drug perceptions and attitudes, behavioral intentions, and drug risk recall.

resultsIndividuals who viewed absolute frequency and/or percentage information more accurately reported drug efficacy than participants who viewed no efficacy information. Participants who viewed relative frequency information generally reported drug efficacy less accurately than participants who viewed other numerical formats.

conclusionAdding efficacy information to DTC ads-both in print and on television-may potentially increase an individual's knowledge of a drug's efficacy, which may improve patient-provider communication and promote more informed decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providing quantitative efficacy information in a combination of formats (e.g., absolute frequency and percent) may help patients remember information and make decisions about prescription drugs.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorPrescription DrugsAdolescentAdultAdvertisingAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsConsumer Health InformationFemaleHumansHypercholesterolemiaMaleMiddle AgedPamphletsPatient Education as TopicTelevisionAnticholesteremic AgentsPrescription DrugsCommunicationDTC advertisingQuantitative information

Identifiers

PMID24581929
PMCPMC10539908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.