Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24581556›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2014

Action versus valence in decision making.

Marc Guitart-Masip, Emrah Duzel, Ray Dolan, Peter Dayan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cortical dopamine reduces the impact of motivational biases governing automated behaviour.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  5. Dopamine Modulates Dynamic Decision-Making during Foraging.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. The social life of Pavlovian learning.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc Guitart-MasipAging Research Centre, Karolinska Institute, SE-11330 Stockholm, Sweden; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: marc.guitart-masip@ki.se.
Emrah DuzelInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK; Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Ray DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Peter DayanGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London W1CN 3AR, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300117Medical Research Council G1002276Wellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 098362Wellcome Trust 098362/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of actions, and the vigor with which they are executed, are influenced by the affective valence of predicted outcomes. This interaction between action and valence significantly influences appropriate and inappropriate choices and is implicated in the expression of psychiatric and neurological abnormalities, including impulsivity and addiction. We review a series of recent human behavioral, neuroimaging, and pharmacological studies whose key design feature is an orthogonal manipulation of action and valence. These studies find that the interaction between the two is subject to the critical influence of dopamine. They also challenge existing views that neural representations in the striatum focus on valence, showing instead a dominance of the anticipation of action.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingDopamineHumansLearningMovementNeuroimagingDopamineactiondopamineinstrumentalPavlovianstriatumvalue

Identifiers

PMID24581556
PMCPMC3989998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.