Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24581078›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2014

Parenting with bipolar disorder: coping with risk of mood disorders to children.

Holly Landrum Peay, Donald L Rosenstein, Barbara Bowles Biesecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Risk Assessment in Psychiatry.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Psychiatric Genomics and Public Mental Health in the Young Mind.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2017
    Article
  6. Paternal Mental Health: Why Is It Relevant?American journal of lifestyle medicine
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Holly Landrum PeaySocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NHGRI Building 31, Room B1B36 31 Center Drive, MSC 2073, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: hpeay@mail.nih.gov.
Donald L RosensteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Physicians Office Building, Room 3134 Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, CB# 7295, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: donald_rosenstein@med.unc.edu.
Barbara Bowles BieseckerSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NHGRI Building 31, Room B1B36 31 Center Drive, MSC 2073, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: barbarab@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Interventions in Genetic CounselingZIAHG200317 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, BARBARA BOWLES · 2009 to 2018
$7.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children of individuals with bipolar disorder (BPD) have increased risk for mood disorders and other adverse psychosocial outcomes due to genetic and environmental risk. Though parents with BPD are aware of increased risk to children, little is known about efforts undertaken in response or their perceived utility. Among parents who self-report with BPD, this study identifies key variables associated with parental coping with children's risk of mood disorders; and explores the relationship between monitoring children's moods and perceived coping efficacy. In this U.S. study, active parental coping with, and cognitive distancing from, child's risk were measured using novel scales. Parents (n = 266) who self-identified as having BPD completed a web-based survey. They had at least one unaffected child. Most participants endorsed monitoring their children's moods. Monitoring was associated with increased perceived control over the child's well-being (p < 0.005), but not feeling less worried. Active parental coping with risk to children was positively associated with active coping with own illness (β = 0.25, p = 0.001), family history (β = 0.24, p = 0.001), and self-report of current depression (β = 0.16, p = 0.037), explaining 13.8% of the variance (F = 8.81, p < 0.001). Cognitive distancing from the child's risk was positively associated with confidence in diagnosis (β = 0.25, p = 0.001), and negatively associated with self-report of current mania (β = -0.19, p = 0.007), perceiving BPD as genetic (β = -0.26, p < 0.001) and having more children (β = -0.20, p = 0.004); explaining 16.2% of the variance (F = 8.63, p < 0.001). Parents' adaptation to their own BPD was modestly correlated with active coping with child's risk (r = 0.15, p < 0.05) but not with cognitive distancing. The findings support the importance of understanding causal attributions and the value of genetic education and counseling for parents with BPD. Further research is necessary to elucidate the psychological benefits of active coping versus cognitive distancing from child's risk, and explore additional variables that predict parental coping with children's risk of mood disorders.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalParent-Child RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedBipolar DisorderChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedMood DisordersParentingParentsBipolar disorderChildrenCopingGeneticMood disorderParentRiskUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24581078
PMCPMC3963259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.