Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24579986›Full record

ArticlePsychology & health2014

Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? A new investigation of a widely held notion.

Jonathan Van 't Riet, Anthony D Cox, Dena Cox, Gregory D Zimet, Gert-Jan De Bruijn, Bas Van den Putte, Hein De Vries, Marieke Q Werrij, Robert A C Ruiter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology & health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of culturally targeted message framing on colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan Van 't Rieta Department of Communication Science, Behavioural Science Institute , Radboud University Nijmegen , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Anthony D Cox
Dena Cox
Gregory D Zimet
Gert-Jan De Bruijn
Bas Van den Putte
Hein De Vries
Marieke Q Werrij
Robert A C Ruiter
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLZuyd University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

Interventions to Increase HBV Vaccination in STD ClinicsR01AI049644 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI ZIMET, GREGORY D. · 2002 to 2006
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049644NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI49644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health-promoting messages can be framed in terms of the beneficial consequences of healthy behaviour (gain-framed messages) or the detrimental consequences of unhealthy behaviour (loss-framed messages). An influential notion holds that the perceived risk associated with the recommended behaviour determines the relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages. This 'risk-framing hypothesis', as we call it, was derived from prospect theory, has been central to health message framing research for the last two decades, and does not cease to appeal to researchers. The present paper examines the validity of the risk-framing hypothesis. We performed six empirical studies on the interaction between perceived risk and message framing. These studies were conducted in two different countries and employed framed messages targeting skin cancer prevention and detection, physical activity, breast self-examination and vaccination behaviour. Behavioural intention served as the outcome measure. None of these studies found evidence in support of the risk-framing hypothesis. We conclude that the empirical evidence in favour of the hypothesis is weak and discuss the ramifications of this for future message framing research.

Indexed as

Persuasive CommunicationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentYoung Adulthealth behaviourmessage framingpersuasionrisk perceptions

Identifiers

PMID24579986
PMCPMC4349530
OpenAlexW2089678262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.