ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2014
Dynamic behavior of the active and inactive states of the adenosine A(2A) receptor.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A methodology for creating mutants of G-protein coupled receptors stabilized in active state by combining statistical thermodynamics and evolutionary molecular engineering.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- Yeast-based directed-evolution for high-throughput structural stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?Biochemistry · 2020Article
- Machine Learning for Prioritization of Thermostabilizing Mutations for G-Protein Coupled Receptors.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Prediction of Conformation Specific Thermostabilizing Mutations for Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2019Article
- Dynamic Role of the G Protein in Stabilizing the Active State of the Adenosine AStructure (London, England : 1993) · 2019Article
- Validating a 14-Drug Microtiter Plate Containing Bedaquiline and Delamanid for Large-Scale Research Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Article
- How Do Short Chain Nonionic Detergents Destabilize G-Protein-Coupled Receptors?Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2016Article
- Conserved Mechanism of Conformational Stability and Dynamics in G-Protein-Coupled Receptors.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2016Article
- How Can Mutations Thermostabilize G-Protein-Coupled Receptors?Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2016Review
- Structural dynamics and thermostabilization of neurotensin receptor 1.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2015Article
- Rapid Computational Prediction of Thermostabilizing Mutations for G Protein-Coupled Receptors.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2014Article
- Structural and energetic effects of A2A adenosine receptor mutations on agonist and antagonist binding.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) belongs to the superfamily of membrane proteins called the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that form one of the largest superfamilies of drug targets. Deriving thermostable mutants has been one of the strategies used for crystallization of A2AR in both the agonist and antagonist bound conformational states. The crystal structures do not reveal differences in the activation mechanism of the mutant receptors compared to the wild type receptor, that have been observed experimentally. These differences stem from the dynamic behavior of the mutant receptors. Furthermore, it is not understood how the mutations confer thermostability. Since these details are difficult to obtain from experiments, we have used atomic level simulations to elucidate the dynamic behavior of the agonist and antagonist bound mutants as well the wild type A2AR. We found that significant enthalpic contribution leads to stabilization of both the inactive state (StaR2) and active-like state (GL31) thermostable mutants of A2AR. Stabilization resulting from mutations of bulky residues to alanine is due to the formation of interhelical hydrogen bonds and van der Waals packing that improves the transmembrane domain packing. The thermostable mutant GL31 shows less movement of the transmembrane helix TM6 with respect to TM3 than the wild type receptor. While restricted dynamics of GL31 is advantageous in its purification and crystallization, it could also be the reason why these mutants are not efficient in activating the G proteins. We observed that the calculated stress on each residue is higher in the wild type receptor compared to the thermostable mutants, and this stress is required for activation to occur. Thus, reduced dynamic behavior of the thermostable mutants leading to lowered activation of these receptors originates from reduced stress on each residue. Finally, accurate calculation of the change in free energy for single mutations shows good correlation with the change in the measured thermostability. These results provide insights into the effect of mutations that can be incorporated in deriving thermostable mutants for other GPCRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.