Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24579057›Full record

ReviewScientifica2014

Bacterial ice crystal controlling proteins.

Janet S H Lorv, David R Rose, Bernard R Glick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientifica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research Progress Regarding PsychrotrophicFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Glaciers as microbial habitats: current knowledge and implication.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2022
    Review
  8. Coexistence of vitreous and crystalline phases of HProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulated strategies of cold-adapted microorganisms in response to cold: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janet S H LorvDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1.
David R RoseDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1.
Bernard R GlickDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the world, many ice active bacteria utilize ice crystal controlling proteins for aid in freezing tolerance at subzero temperatures. Ice crystal controlling proteins include both antifreeze and ice nucleation proteins. Antifreeze proteins minimize freezing damage by inhibiting growth of large ice crystals, while ice nucleation proteins induce formation of embryonic ice crystals. Although both protein classes have differing functions, these proteins use the same ice binding mechanisms. Rather than direct binding, it is probable that these protein classes create an ice surface prior to ice crystal surface adsorption. Function is differentiated by molecular size of the protein. This paper reviews the similar and different aspects of bacterial antifreeze and ice nucleation proteins, the role of these proteins in freezing tolerance, prevalence of these proteins in psychrophiles, and current mechanisms of protein-ice interactions.

Identifiers

PMID24579057
PMCPMC3918373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.