Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24578934›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2012

Selected examples of complications after minimally invasive treatment for urolithiasis.

Waldemar Różański, Leszek Klimek, Marek Lipiński, Rafał Kliś

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Waldemar Różański2 Department of Urology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Leszek KlimekInstitute of Materials Science and Technology, Division of Materials Investigation of the Technical University of Łódź; Division of Biophysics, Department of Basic and Pre-Clinical Science of the Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Marek Lipiński2 Department of Urology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Rafał Kliś2 Department of Urology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years urologists have concentrated on the intense introduction of minimally invasive methods for the treatment of urinary tract diseases with major progress noted in the treatment of urolithiasis. Nowadays extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) are widely used in the treatment of urinary tract lithiasis. The aim of this study is to present examples of urinary tract lithiasis as the complication after minimally invasive methods used in the treatment of urolithiasis. One should remember that even minimally invasive medical procedures using the instruments retained in long-term contact with urine may be the cause of incrustation and stone formation.

Indexed as

minimally invasive treatmentstone

Identifiers

PMID24578934
PMCPMC3921780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.