Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24578880›Full record

ReviewCentral European journal of urology2011

New valve-mechanical model of urinary tract function: the theory of biological dual valves.

Arpad Dani, Peter Szendrő

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Central European journal of urology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arpad DaniLausitzer Seenland Klinikum, Hoyerswerda, Germany.
Peter SzendrőFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Szent Istvan University, Gödöllő, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUntil now, peristalsis has been the only known method of urine transport. The main objective of this paper was to study urinary tract function - especially the upper urinary tract, the ureter - from a new mechanical point of view. The physical (physical dual valves) and biological basis (biological dual valves) of a new functional model is presented based on previous observations and knowledge.

methodsA review of the literature was performed, with special emphasis on ureter motility.

resultsAfter analyzing the anatomy and physiology of the urinary tract, complemented by basic physical observations, the authors have developed a new valve-mechanical model of urinary tract function. A comprehensive mechanical hypothesis is also presented, integrating the role of peristalsis.

conclusionsThe authors believe that the new theory enhances previous knowledge. From a structural point of view, the urinary tract may be considered to consist of dualvalves. The dual-valve mechanism combined with peristalsis allows better explanation of the function of the upper urinary tract in particular. The main conclusion is that the flow in the urinary tract must be studied integrally within the body. This new theory does not contradict well-known and acknowledged theories, and moreover, it may help solve certain medical problems.

Indexed as

new biological modelperistalsisurinary tract physiology

Identifiers

PMID24578880
PMCPMC3921727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.