Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24578680›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2014

Therapeutic intraspinal stimulation to generate activity and promote long-term recovery.

Sarah E Mondello, Michael R Kasten, Philip J Horner, Chet T Moritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Spinal Interneurons as Gatekeepers to Neuroplasticity after Injury or Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Now is the Critical Time for Engineered Neuroplasticity.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Regenerative Rehabilitation: Combining Stem Cell Therapies and Activity-Dependent Stimulation.Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E MondelloDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA ; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA ; Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
Michael R KastenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
Philip J HornerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA ; Graduate Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
Chet T MoritzDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA ; Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA ; Graduate Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA ; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Combined stem cell transplantation and targeted microstimulation to direct the foR01NS066357 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HORNER, PHILIP J, MORITZ, CHET T. · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS066357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroprosthetic approaches have tremendous potential for the treatment of injuries to the brain and spinal cord by inducing appropriate neural activity in otherwise disordered circuits. Substantial work has demonstrated that stimulation applied to both the central and peripheral nervous system leads to immediate and in some cases sustained benefits after injury. Here we focus on cervical intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) as a promising method of activating the spinal cord distal to an injury site, either to directly produce movements or more intriguingly to improve subsequent volitional control of the paretic extremities. Incomplete injuries to the spinal cord are the most commonly observed in human patients, and these injuries spare neural tissue bypassing the lesion that could be influenced by neural devices to promote recovery of function. In fact, recent results have demonstrated that therapeutic ISMS leads to modest but sustained improvements in forelimb function after an incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). This therapeutic spinal stimulation may promote long-term recovery of function by providing the necessary electrical activity needed for neuron survival, axon growth, and synaptic stability.

Indexed as

electrical activityISMSneuroprosthesisregenerative stimulationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID24578680
PMCPMC3936503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.