Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24578583›Full record

ArticleWater, air, and soil pollution

Enumerating Microorganism Surrogates for Groundwater Transport Studies Using Solid-Phase Cytometry.

Margaret E Stevenson, A Paul Blaschke, Sonja Schauer, Matthias Zessner, Regina Sommer, Andreas H Farnleitner, Alexander K T Kirschner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water, air, and soil pollution. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret E StevensonCentre for Water Resource Systems, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
A Paul BlaschkeInstitute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria ; Interuniversity Cooperation Centre Water and Health (ICC), www.waterandhealth.at, Vienna, Austria.
Sonja SchauerInstitute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias ZessnerInstitute for Water Quality, Resource and Waste Management, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
Regina SommerInstitute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria ; Interuniversity Cooperation Centre Water and Health (ICC), www.waterandhealth.at, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas H FarnleitnerInstitute of Chemical Engineering, Research Group Environmental Microbiology and Molecular Ecology, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorfer Straße 1a, 1060 Vienna, Austria ; Interuniversity Cooperation Centre Water and Health (ICC), www.waterandhealth.at, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander K T KirschnerInstitute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria ; Interuniversity Cooperation Centre Water and Health (ICC), www.waterandhealth.at, Vienna, Austria.
TU Wien · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATInteruniversity Cooperation Centre Water & Health · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations on the pollution of groundwater with pathogenic microorganisms, e.g. tracer studies for groundwater transport, are constrained by their potential health risk. Thus, microspheres are often used in groundwater transport studies as non-hazardous surrogates for pathogenic microorganisms. Even though pathogenic microorganisms occur at low concentrations in groundwater, current detection methods of microspheres (spectrofluorimetry, flow cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy) have rather high detection limits and are unable to detect rare events. Solid-phase cytometry (SPC) offers the unique capability of reliably quantifying extremely low concentrations of fluorescently labelled microorganisms or microspheres in natural waters, including groundwater. Until now, microspheres have been used in combination with SPC only for instrument calibration purposes and not for environmental applications. In this study, we explored the limits of the SPC methodology for its applicability to groundwater transport studies. The SPC approach proved to be a highly sensitive and reliable enumeration system for microorganism surrogates down to a minimum size of 0.5 μm, in up to 500 ml of groundwater, and 0.75 μm, in up to 1 ml of turbid surface water. Hence, SPC is proposed to be a useful method for enumerating microspheres for groundwater transport studies in the laboratory, as well as in the field when non-toxic, natural products are used.

Indexed as

ChemScan™ RDIDrinking water resourcesGroundwaterMicrospheresPathogen surrogatesSolid-phase cytometry

Identifiers

PMID24578583
PMCPMC3928530
OpenAlexW1989258443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.