Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24578581›Full record

ArticleJournal of educational psychology2014

Intensive Reading Remediation in Grade 2 or 3: Are There Effects a Decade Later?

Benita A Blachman, Christopher Schatschneider, Jack M Fletcher, Maria S Murray, Kristen A Munger, Michael G Vaughn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of educational psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. The Not-So-Simple View of Writing in Struggling Readers/Writers.Reading & writing quarterly : overcoming learning difficulties · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Effects of One versus Two Years of Intensive Reading Intervention Implemented with Late Elementary Struggling Readers.Learning disabilities research & practice : a publication of the Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benita A BlachmanDepartment of Psychology and Reading and Language Arts Center, Syracuse University.
Christopher SchatschneiderDepartment of Psychology and Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.
Jack M FletcherDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston.
Maria S MurrayDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, State University of New York at Oswego.
Kristen A MungerReading and Language Arts Center, Syracuse University; Department of Counseling and Psychological Services at State University of New York at Oswego.
Michael G VaughnSchool of Social Work, St. Louis University.
Florida State University · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Texas Center for Learning DisabilitiesP50HD052117 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI FLETCHER, JACK M · 2006 to 2023
$26.9M
Intensive Reading Remediation in Grade 2 or 3: Are There Effects A Decade Later?R21HD060791 · NICHD · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI BLACHMAN, BENITA A. · 2009 to 2010
$410k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052117NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD060791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite data supporting the benefits of early reading interventions, there has been little evaluation of the long-term educational impact of these interventions, with most follow-up studies lasting less than two years (Suggate, 2010). This study evaluated reading outcomes more than a decade after the completion of an 8-month reading intervention using a randomized design with second and third graders selected on the basis of poor word-level skills (Blachman et al., 2004). Fifty-eight (84%) of the original 69 participants took part in the study. The treatment group demonstrated a moderate to small effect size advantage on reading and spelling measures over the comparison group. There were statistically significant differences with moderate effect sizes between treatment and comparison groups on standardized measures of word recognition (i.e., Woodcock Basic Skills Cluster,

Indexed as

longitudinal effectsreading difficultiesreading interventionremediation

Identifiers

PMID24578581
PMCPMC3933175
OpenAlexW1977414494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.