ArticleNeurosurgical review2014
Carotid artery occlusion for the treatment of symptomatic giant carotid aneurysms: a proposal of classification and surgical protocol.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020Pooled it
- Endovascular Embolization Through Grafts for Recurrent Giant Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms After Combined Microsurgical Low-Flow With Subsequent High-Flow Revascularization and Parent Artery Occlusion.Neurosurgery practice · 2024Article
- Distal Endovascular Occlusion for Incomplete Occlusion of Cavernous Carotid Aneurysms after High-flow Bypass and Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Ligation.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2023Article
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography-based Prediction of the Results of Balloon Test Occlusion.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2019Article
- Treatment Outcomes of Cerebral Aneurysms Presenting with Optic Neuropathy: A Retrospective Case Series.Asian journal of neurosurgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant intracranial aneurysms are rare disorders that represent only 5% of all intracranial aneurysms; they have a wide variety of presentations including rupture, embolic effects, and mass effect symptoms that can mislead the diagnosis to tumors rather than aneurysms. Their treatment is difficult and carries higher morbidity and mortality than usual aneurysms due to their complex nature. This study involved retrospective analysis of data of 28 patients, managed between 2006 and 2012, suffering from giant internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with various presenting symptoms, none of which was hemorrhage. They were all evaluated by BOT prior to any intervention; they were subjected to various treatment strategies including selective coiling, parent artery occlusion with or without bypass, aneurysm trapping with or without bypass, and patients were followed for a period ranging from 6 months to 5 years. Out of 26 patients with giant aneurysms with mass effects, 16 patients showed full recovery (61.5 %), 5 showed partial improvement (19.2 %), and 5 showed no change in mass effect symptoms (19.2 %). One patient died (3.5 %). Symptoms such as TIA or epistaxis showed complete recovery. This study shows that a well-designed protocol aiming at parent artery sacrifice will yield good to excellent results in managing ICA giant aneurysms, and it also shows that parent artery sacrifice is superior to other forms of treatment of these lesions regarding recurrence rates, morbidity, and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.