Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24578099›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2014

Carotid artery occlusion for the treatment of symptomatic giant carotid aneurysms: a proposal of classification and surgical protocol.

Sherif Rashad, Tamer Hassan, Waseem Aziz, Ahmed Marei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sherif RashadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Alexandria University School of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Tamer Hassan
Waseem Aziz
Ahmed Marei
Alexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant intracranial aneurysms are rare disorders that represent only 5% of all intracranial aneurysms; they have a wide variety of presentations including rupture, embolic effects, and mass effect symptoms that can mislead the diagnosis to tumors rather than aneurysms. Their treatment is difficult and carries higher morbidity and mortality than usual aneurysms due to their complex nature. This study involved retrospective analysis of data of 28 patients, managed between 2006 and 2012, suffering from giant internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with various presenting symptoms, none of which was hemorrhage. They were all evaluated by BOT prior to any intervention; they were subjected to various treatment strategies including selective coiling, parent artery occlusion with or without bypass, aneurysm trapping with or without bypass, and patients were followed for a period ranging from 6 months to 5 years. Out of 26 patients with giant aneurysms with mass effects, 16 patients showed full recovery (61.5 %), 5 showed partial improvement (19.2 %), and 5 showed no change in mass effect symptoms (19.2 %). One patient died (3.5 %). Symptoms such as TIA or epistaxis showed complete recovery. This study shows that a well-designed protocol aiming at parent artery sacrifice will yield good to excellent results in managing ICA giant aneurysms, and it also shows that parent artery sacrifice is superior to other forms of treatment of these lesions regarding recurrence rates, morbidity, and mortality.

Indexed as

Vascular Surgical ProceduresAdultCarotid StenosisFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24578099
OpenAlexW1988871819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.